Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 29;11:1138. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01138

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Response of hvabi5.d to ABA spraying. (A) Stomatal conductance of hvabi5.d and its WT parent “Sebastian” after ABA treatment. The statistical analysis was performed using the two-way ANOVA (P ≤ 0.05) followed by Tukey’s honestly significant difference test (Tukey HSD-test) (P ≤ 0.05) to assess the differences between different growth conditions and between genotypes. Statistically significant differences (P ≤ 0.05) are marked by different letters. The expression of (B) HvNCED1CAROTENOID CLEAVAGE DIOXYGENASE1 (C) HvSnRK2.1SNF1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASE 2.1, and (D) HvABI5ABA INSENSITIVE5 in hvabi5.d and its WT 3 h after ABA treatment. The statistical significance was estimated by T-test between analyzed genotypes—**P ≤ 0.01, ***P ≤ 0.001 and between analyzed points—##P ≤ 0.01, ###P ≤ 0.001.