Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Fam Stud. 2019 Jun 28;28(11):3193–3206. doi: 10.1007/s10826-019-01495-5

Table 4.

Hierarchical Multiple Regression Analysis to Predict 9th Grade Father-Adolescent Conflict

Sample Analyzed
Residential & Nonresidential Fathersa Residential Fathers Onlyb
Step and predictor Δ in R2 B (SE) β Δ in R2 B (SE) β
1. Covariates .663*** .632***
 (constant) 0.13(0.93) 0.49(1.06)
 Maternal Depression 0.36(0.65) 0.03 0.85(0.72) 0.08
 Years since Divorce −0.03(0.06) −0.02 −0.06(0.13) −0.05
 Adolescent Gender 0.24(0.55) 0.02 −0.09(0.64) −0.01
 Conflict with Mother-9th grade 0.13(0.06) 0.06* 0.19(0.08) 0.16*
 Conflict with Father-8th grade 0.79(0.06) 0.77*** 0.71(0.07) 0.71***
2. Main Effects .010 .026c
 Internalizing Symptoms-8th grade 0.06(0.04) 0.10 0.79(0.04) 0.15*
 Externalizing Symptoms-8th grade 0.00(0.03) 0.01 0.02(0.04) 0.03
 Father Residential Status or Type 0.02(0.81) 0.00 2.08(2.17) 0.17
3. Interactions .015 .013
 Internalizing x Externalizing 0.00(0.00) 0.19 0.00(0.00) 0.08
 Father Residential or Father Type x Internalizing 0.16(0.12) 1.04 0.05(0.08) 0.23
 Father Residential or Father Type x Externalizing 0.03(0.08) 0.22 0.10(0.08) 0.54
Cumulative R2 .688 .671
Final F (11,115)a,(11,89)b 20.052*** 16.499***
a

Regression includes Father Residential Status in Step 2 and Step 3

b

Regression includes Type of Father (biological or step) in Step 2 and 3.

c

Step was marginally significant (p < .08).

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.