Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 21;101(16):1470–1478. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00970

TABLE V.

Regression Results: Effect of Upper-Extremity Amputation Status on SMFA Scores of Participants with Unilateral Upper-Extremity Injuries (N = 137)

Total Dysfunction* Mobility Subscore* Daily Activities Subscore* Emotional Subscore* Arm and Hand Subscore*
Upper-extremity amputation −2.95 (−8.78 to 2.87) −5.47 (−12.1 to 1.13) −1.53 (−9.23 to 6.16) −7.68 (−16.1 to 0.78) 2.23 (−5.32 to 9.79)
METALS lower-extremity injury 7.03 (1.70 to 12.37) 19.6 (13.5 to 25.6) 4.61 (−2.43 to 11.65) 5.25 (−2.49 to 12.99) −2.46 (−9.37 to 4.45)
Age 0.73 (0.34 to 1.12) 0.61 (0.16 to 1.05) 0.57 (0.05 to 1.09) 0.84 (0.27 to 1.41) 0.97 (0.46 to 1.48)
Months to interview −0.23 (−0.42 to −0.05) −0.20 (−0.41 to 0.01) −0.39 (−0.64 to −0.15) −0.19 (−0.46 to 0.08) −0.11 (−0.35 to 0.13)
Rank
 Junior enlisted Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
 Senior enlisted −5.14 (−10.9 to 0.64) −1.47 (−8.00 to 5.07) −5.62 (−13.2 to 2.00) −8.00 (−16.4 to 0.38) −6.16 (−13.6 to 1.33)
 Commissioned officer −7.79 (−17.0 to 1.44) −6.71 (−17.2 to 3.73) −5.55 (−17.7 to 6.63) −15.4 (−28.8 to −2.01) −5.14 (−17.1 to 6.82)
No. of combat experiences 1.04 (0.38 to 1.70) 0.88 (0.14 to 1.63) 0.72 (−0.15 to 1.59) 2.07 (1.11 to 3.02) 0.72 (−0.13 to 1.58)
Social support
 Low (≤70) Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
 Moderate (71 to 80) −7.46 (−13.4 to −1.49) −5.34 (−12.1 to 1.41) −6.22 (−14.1 to 1.66) −14.5 (−23.2 to −5.87) −5.20 (−12.9 to 2.54)
 High (>80) −7.94 (−14.4 to −1.44) −5.28 (−12.6 to 2.07) −9.65 (−18.2 to −1.07) −15.8 (−25.2 to −6.33) −1.94 (−10.4 to 6.49)
R2 0.27 0.36 0.17 0.30 0.15
*

The values are given as the regression coefficient, with the 95% confidence interval in parentheses; higher SMFA scores represent worse function in a given domain.

Significant at p < 0.05.

Significant at p < 0.01.