Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 5;18:210. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01671-1

Table 3.

Comparison of the cohort characteristics between three parity groups

Characteristics Number of parities Statistics*
0 1 to 4 ≥ 5 F or χ2 P Post hoc*
Age, mean ± SD, years 74 ± 8.3 72.3 ± 7.7 75.6 ± 7.7 224.345 < 0.001 a > b, a < c, b < c
Educational level, % 1122.978 < 0.001
 ≤ 6 years or primary school or under 36.5 43.9 80.0
 7 to 12 years or secondary school 44.4 42.6 17.1
 > 12 years or tertiary school or above 19.1 13.6 2.9
Hypertension, % 69.3 65.2 70.9 33.289 < 0.001 a > b, b < c
Diabetes mellitus, % 13.1 16.5 23.5 84.376 < 0.001 a < b, a < c, b < c,
Dementia prevalence, % 5.8 5.0 10.5 103.961 < 0.001 a < c, b < c,
Dementia subtypes, % 112.556 < 0.001
 AD 4.6 3.1 7.1
 VD 0.6 0.5 1.1
 NAVD 2.2 1.0 2.4

*Continuous variables were compared using analysis of variance, and categorical variables were compared using the χ2 test. Post hoc comparisons were based on Scheffé’s theorem: a = nulliparity; b = 1 to 4 parities; c = grand multiparity

Estimated using 9 cohorts providing data on dementia subtypes