Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):669–682. doi: 10.5551/jat.51961

Table 3. Comparison of the accuracy of risk assessment for the development of coronary heart disease between the models adjusted for potential risk factors with and without small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

c-statistics (95% CI) p value for difference in c-statistics cNRI (95% CI) after adding sdLDL cholesterol or LDL cholesterol p value for NRI IDI (95% CI) after adding sdLDL cholesterol or LDL cholesterol p value for IDI
Basic model 0.774
(0.730–0.817)
reference - reference - reference
Basic model + log(serum sdLDL cholesterol) 0.794
(0.754–0.835)
0.02 0.40
(0.18–0.62)
< 0.001 0.008
(0.001–0.01)
0.02
Basic model + serum LDL cholesterol 0.793
(0.750–0.836)
0.06 0.49
(0.27–0.70)
< 0.001 0.007
(0.002–0.01)
0.01

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; cNRI, continuous net reclassification improvement; IDI, integrated discrimination improvement; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; sdLDL, small dense low-density lipoprotein.

The basic model was adjusted for age, sex, systolic blood pressure, use of antihypertensive agents, hemoglobin A1c, use of glucose-lowering agents, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, lipid-modifying agents, body mass index, estimated glomerular filtration rate, electrocardiogram abnormalities, current smoking, current drinking, and regular exercise.