Skip to main content
. 2020 May 12;52(4):1587–1598. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01336-9

Table 5.

Results for the scaling distances calculated from the size settings

Predictor Estimate SE t DF p Lower Upper
Intercept 17.756 4.8614 3.6524 3996 0.00026318 8.2245 27.287
Headset 7.8532 6.8807 1.1413 3996 0.2538 − 5.6368 21.343
Distance 0.37739 0.067201 5.6158 3996 2.0898e-08 0.24564 0.50914
Headset-by-distance 0.13453 0.095099 1.4146 3996 0.15726 − 0.051918 0.32098

Effective distance increased with rendered distance at a rate of 38 %, indicating incomplete scaling. There was no effect of headset, and no headset-by-distance interaction. These results indicate no difference in size constancy in the two headsets