Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 20;63(9):1847–1856. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05201-9

Table 2.

Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis with the fastest 25% eGFR decline as the outcome variable (compared with all other participants or compared with those with stable middle 50% eGFR decline)

Variable Fastest 25% eGFR decline vs all other Fastest 25% eGFR decline vs stable 50% eGFR decline
OR (95% CI) p value OR (95% CI) p value
Serum sphingomyelin (1 SD increase in CU)a 1.36 (1.15, 1.61) <0.001 1.27 (1.06, 1.52) 0.010
Sex (male = 1) 1.36 (0.96, 1.92) 0.083 1.25 (0.86, 1.82) 0.236
Diabetes duration (years) 1.02 (1.01, 1.04) 0.006 1.03 (1.01, 1.04) 0.005
Age at diabetes onset (years) 0.99 (0.97, 1.01) 0.28 1.00 (0.97, 1.02) 0.644
Smoking (current vs never) 1.08 (0.74, 1.58) 0.70 1.05 (0.71, 1.57) 0.80
Smoking (ex vs never) 1.08 (0.72, 1.63) 0.71 1.06 (0.68, 1.64) 0.80
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) 1.01 (1.00, 1.02) 0.034 1.01 (1.00, 1.02) 0.061
HbA1c (mmol/mol) 1.02 (1.01, 1.03) <0.001 1.02 (1.01, 1.03) <0.001
BMI (kg/m2) 0.91 (0.86, 0.95) <0.001 0.90 (0.86, 0.95) <0.001
HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l) 0.30 (0.19, 0.50) <0.001 0.35 (0.21, 0.61) <0.001
Triacylglycerols (mmol/l) 1.27 (1.04, 1.54) 0.019 1.28 (1.03, 1.59) 0.024

25% fastest eGFR decline had a median yearly eGFR decline −4.4 (IQR −6.8, −3.1) ml min−1 1.73 m−2, whereas the stable 50% eGFR decline group had a median yearly eGFR decline −0.9 (IQR −1.4, −0.6) ml min−1 1.73 m−2

aNMR measures are provided in CU based on the trimethylsilyl propanoic acid reference signal