Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 5;10:272. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-00944-w

Table 2.

Linear regression models.

Model b p value R2 R2 adj LRT (df) p value
Baseline model I (B1): with CA as regressor
B1 CA 0.44 <0.001 3% 3%
Baseline model II (B2): adding gender to B1
Compared against B1
B2 Gender −0.30 <0.001 4% 4% 25.33 (1) <0.001
Adding RFs and age-14 distress (D14) separately to B2
Compared against B2
M1 RFs −0.86 20% 19% 297.25 (10) <0.001
Compared against B2
M2 D14 0.63 <0.001 23% 23% 357.07 (1) <0.001
Adding RFs and age-14 distress (D14) together to B2
Compared against M2
M3 RFs −0.19 24% 23% 22.11 (10) 0.07
Compared against M1
M3 D14 0.54 <0.001 24% 23% 81.93 (1) <0.001

There is no p value for the RFs in model M1 and M3, as the bs of the RFs are here summed up to illustrate whether the cumulative effect is positive or negative, but as the RFs are ten individuals regressors there is no cumulative p value.

adj adjusted, LRT Likelihood-ratio test.