Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 5;10:272. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-00944-w

Table 5.

Linear prediction analyses for the whole group: for RFs only (M1), age-14 distress only (M2), and RFs and age-14 distress together (M3).

M1: RFs only M2: D14 only M3: RFs and D14
Observed Predicted Observed Predicted Observed Predicted
RMSE 1.18 1.18 1.15 1.13 1.16 1.13
R2 0.18 0.16 0.23 0.22 0.22 0.22
MAE 0.90 0.91 0.87 0.88 0.88 0.88
Accuracy – 37.14% – 40.00% – 40.71%
Predicted into CI95% – 104 – 112 – 114
Not predicted into CI95% – 176 – 168 – 166

Accuracy plots

x-axis:

Observed (left = black) vs. predicted (right = grey) distribution

y-axis:

Distress level

 graphic file with name 41398_2020_944_Figa_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41398_2020_944_Figb_HTML.gif graphic file with name 41398_2020_944_Figc_HTML.gif

All models were computed with childhood adversity and gender as predictors. Model accuracy was based on 1000 bootstraps. D14 age-14 distress, RMSE root mean squared error, MAE mean absolute error, Accuracy relative number of correctly predicted cases.