Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 30;11:715. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00715

Table 4.

Multiple linear regression analyses of depressive symptoms (PHQ-9) for female and male migrants of Turkish origin.

Independent variables Females (EV=8.9%) Males (EV=17.2%)
Regression coefficient(95% CI) Standard error Beta T p Regression coefficient(95% CI) Standard error Beta T p
Constant 3.789 (-1.910, 9.487) 2.885 1.313 0.191 7.173 (-0.434 – 14.780) 3.838 1.869 0.064
Acculturation group
Integration Ref. Ref.
Assimilation 1.225 (-1.629, 4.079) 1.445 0.087 0.848 0.398 0.417 (-2.761, 3.595) 1.604 0.028 0.260 0.795
Separation 4.424 (1.680, 7.168) 1.389 0.314 3.185 0.002 4.008 (0.704, 7.312) 1.667 0.270 2.404 0.018
Marginalization 2.690 (-0.239, 5.618) 1.483 0.174 1.814 0.072 2.570 (-0.763, 5.903) 1.682 0.162 1.528 0.129
Age -0.015 (-0.116, 0.086) 0.051 -0.026 -0.295 0.768 -0.061 (-0.174, 0.052) 0.057 -0.110 -1.066 0.289
Partnership 2.558 (0.256, 4.859) 1.165 0.168 2.195 0.030 2.458 (-1.051, 5.968) 1.771 0.122 1.388 0.168
Education -2.280 (-4.537, -0.022) 1.143 -0.164 -1.995 0.048 0.010 (-2.375, 2.395) 1.203 0.001 0.009 0.993
Employment status -0.761 (-3.086, 1.565) 1.177 -0.052 -0.646 0.519 -3.317 (-5.710, -0.924) 1.207 -0.255 -2.748 0.007
Generation of migration -2.922 (-5.926, 0.081) 1.521 -0.177 -1.922 0.056 -2.401 (-6.447, 1.645) 2.041 -0.140 -1.176 0.242
German language proficiency 1.718 (-0.663, 4,100) 1.206 0.133 1.425 0.156 -0.716 (-3.651, 2.219) 1.481 -0.055 -0.484 0.630

EV, explanation of variance; Ref., Reference; Partnership: (yes vs. no); Education: dichotomized: below secondary/vocational education vs. secondary/vocational education; Employment status: dichotomized: unemployed/jobseeking/pensioner/other vs. employed; Generation of migration: first vs. second; German language proficiency: dichotomized: bad/little/moderate vs. good/very good/German as mother tongue; significant predictors are marked in bold.