Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 1;10(8):2629–2639. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401172

Table 3. Phenotypic correlation between environments for kernel Zn.

DH1 DH 2 ZAM Panel
aEnv1 vs. Env2 0.62 0.46 0.63
aEnv1 vs. Env3 0.58 0.29 0.66
aEnv2 vs. Env3 0.62 0.45 0.61

Phenotypic correlation coefficients were significant at α = 0.001.

a

DH populations; Env1, Env2 and Env3 = Celaya,2014, Tlaltizapan, 2017 and Tlaltizapan 2017, respectively.

a

ZAM panel; Env1, Env2 and Env3= Agua Fria, 2012, Celaya, 2012 and Agua Fria 2013, respectively.