Abstract
Rett syndrome is a rare genetic disorder that affects brain development and causes severe mental and physical disability. This systematic review analyzes the most recent evidence concerning the role of physical therapy in the management of individuals with Rett syndrome. The review was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. A total of 17319 studies were found in the main scientific databases. Applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 22 studies were admitted to the final phase of the review. Level of evidence of the included studies was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine—Levels of Evidence guide. Nine approaches to physical therapy for patients with Rett syndrome were identified: applied behavior analysis, conductive education, environmental enrichment, traditional physiotherapy with or without aids, hydrotherapy, treadmill, music therapy, computerized systems, and sensory-based treatment. It has been reported that patients had clinically benefited from the analysed approaches despite the fact that they did not have strong research evidence. According to the results, a multimodal individualized physical therapy program should be regularly recommended to patients with Rett syndrome in order to preserve autonomy and to improve quality of life. However, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Keywords: Rett syndrome, intellectual disability, movement disorders, physical therapy modalities, physiotherapy, rehabilitation, evidence-based medicine
1. Introduction
Rett syndrome (RTT) is a rare, progressive neurodevelopmental disorder which mostly affects females; its prevalence is estimated between 1:10000 and 1:15000 [1]. RTT was first described in the medical literature by an Austrian physician named Andreas Rett in 1966 [2]. Nowadays, RTT is considered as a part of a spectrum of disease related to mutation of the methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MECP2) gene, which is located on the long arm (q) of the X chromosome (Xq28). The MECP2 gene codes for a protein that may downregulate the activity of many other genes. Therefore, mutations in MECP2 gene lead to defective epigenetic regulatory molecules [3,4]. The spectrum of MECP2-related phenotypes includes classic RTT, variant RTT, MECP2-related severe neonatal encephalopathy, and Psychosis, Pyramidal signs, Parkinsonism, and Macro-orchidism (PPM)-X syndrome [5,6]. Clinical feature of RTT patients is highly variable [7]. Development generally proceeds normally for about 6 to 18 months after birth; at this point, RTT patients enter a period of developmental stagnation which is followed by loss of previously acquired skills, such as hand movements and ability to communicate. Between 12 months and 4 years after birth, children develop autistic-like behaviors (i.e., lack of interest in social interaction and language regression), problems in general dynamic coordination (ataxia), and stereotypic hand movements, the last of which are considered a hallmark of the disease. During this time period, patients often develop breathing irregularities, such as temporary stopping of breathing (apnea) or hyperventilation syndrome, irregular sleep-wake rhythm, feeding and swallowing difficulties, seizures, and irritability [8,9,10,11]. After this period of rapid deterioration, neurological features stabilize, and some affected children may even show slight improvement in the ability of communicate. In the last stage of the disease, patients develop serious motor impairment, also due to the onset of muscle weakness, joint contractures, and spasticity. A variety of additional symptoms can occur in RTT patients including scoliosis, osteopenia, bowel dysmotility, functional megacolon, obesity, and esotropia [12,13,14,15,16].
Life expectancy for people with RTT depends on the age when symptoms first begin and their severity. Many patients live well into adulthood, although they may require constant care. A 2010 study by Kirby et al. showed that almost all girls with RTT reach the age of 10, with a more than 50 percent chance of reaching age 50 [17].
Symptoms, progression, and severity of people with RTT can vary from one patient to another, leading to a wide range of neuromotor and intellectual disabilities. The management of such disabilities requires a multidisciplinary approach. The RTT multidisciplinary team may include (1) medical and surgical subspecialists, such as pediatricians, neurologists, child neuropsychiatrists, gastroenterologists, physiatrists, and orthopedic surgeons, and (2) allied health professionals, such as dieticians, physiotherapists, speech and occupational therapists, psychologists, and specialized nurses. In addition, alternative and complementary therapies could also be part of the RTT multidisciplinary management program [18].
In accordance with the 2006 guidelines by Lotan, patients with RTT need an individually tailored intervention program for the entire duration of their life [19]. Such a program should be the result of a careful evaluation employed by the group of patient, medical doctors, caregivers and therapists. The intervention program originating from such an evaluation should create a continuous network of human support around the individual with RTT, in order to improve his quality of life by overcoming or reducing limitations.
Physical therapy is a branch of rehabilitation and its aim is to preserve, enhance, or restore movement and physical function impaired or threatened by disease, injury, or disability, using therapeutic exercise, physical modalities, assistive devices, and patient education and training. Physiotherapy is an essential tool in the management of several neuromuscular diseases and genetic disorders, with quite strong evidence of effectiveness [20,21,22,23,24]; its usefulness is even more evident if those pathologies affect children [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32].
Aim of the present review was to find the current best evidence concerning the role of physical therapy in the management of people with RTT.
The Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) method was used to formulate the clinical query according to the following parameters: (a) Population: RTT patients, (b) Intervention: physical therapy, (c) Comparator: no physical therapy, and (d) Outcome: improvement of functional outcome and quality of life [33].
2. Materials and Methods
This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [34].
2.1. Study Eligibility Criteria and Report Eligibility Criteria
Letters, comments, editorials, conference proceedings, and practice guidelines were not considered for this systematic review. Studies were not limited to any particular design. The following study eligibility criteria were applied: (a) patients of any age affected by RTT; (b) physical therapy applied to at least a proportion of the patients; (c) adequate data provided; (d) no limits applied as to the minimum length of the follow-up. The criteria for the report were as follows: (a) written in the English language; (b) including already published data; and (c) including studies published from January 2000 up until December 2019.
2.2. Information Sources
For the purpose of identifying relevant studies, a systematic review of the literature was performed using the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, PeDro, and Google Scholar. The literature search was conducted by two investigators independently.
2.3. Search Strategy
The following search terms were used: ‘Rett syndrome’, ‘physical therapy’, ‘physiotherapy’, ‘rehabilitation’.
2.4. Study Selection
Eligibility assessment of the selected studies was performed independently by two reviewers in an unblinded and standardised manner. All titles and abstracts were screened and ineligible articles were excluded. Then, the full text of the studies meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed in detail by investigators.
2.5. Data Collection Process
Data from original articles were recorded on a data extraction form. The following data were extracted by one investigator and then crosschecked by the other: general information concerning the study (lead author and year of publication), study design, physical therapy approach, number of participants, assessment tool, follow-up duration, main results/findings, and level of evidence (grade of recommendation). Disagreements between the two reviewers on extraction of data were resolved by discussion; if no agreement could be reached, a third reviewer would be invited to make a decision.
2.6. Level of Evidence Assessment Process
Level of evidence was assessed independently by two of the investigators using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM)—Levels of Evidence guide [35]. Publication bias was not assessed because of the small number of selected studies.
3. Results
A total of 17,319 potentially relevant records emerged from the keywords searching in PubMed (n = 319), Cochrane Library (n = 0), PeDro (n = 0), and Google Scholar (n = 17000) databases. 16400 records were immediately removed as they were letters, comments, editorials, conference proceedings, and practice guidelines. Following this, a screening of the title and abstract of the 919 remaining studies was made, resulting in the elimination of types of publications different from what was stated in the inclusion criteria. Duplicates were also excluded. This second screening allowed an additional 869 results to be eliminated. Therefore, the full-text version of a total of 50 articles was assessed; 28 articles did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded. Eventually, a total of 22 studies were considered eligible. The selected results were classified as follows: 14 case reports, 2 case series, 2 multiple baseline studies, 1 single-case A-B-A-B design study, 1 single-case AB design study, 1 case-control study, and 1 modified individually randomized stepped wedge trial. From the detailed analysis of selected articles, nine approaches to physical therapy in patients with RTT were identified: (1) applied behavior analysis, (2) conductive education, (3) environmental enrichment, (4) traditional physical therapy with or without aids, (5) hydrotherapy, (6) treadmill, (7) music therapy, (8) computerized systems and (9) sensory-based treatment (Snoezelen).
The PRISMA flow diagram used for study selection process is summarised in Figure 1. The details of studies selected for the systematic review are listed in Table 1.
Figure 1.
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) flow chart concerning study retrieval and selection.
Table 1.
Summary of the studies included in the review.
| Lead Author and Year of Publication | Study Design | Physical Therapy Approach | Number of Participants | Assessment Tool | Follow-up Duration | Main Results/Findings | Level of Evidence (Grade of Recom- Mendation) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Larsson G. 2001 [36] |
Case report | Kinesiotherapy + orthoses + aids (following surgery) |
3 | Narrative summary | Different for each case |
|
4 (C) |
| Yasuhara A. 2001 [37] |
Case report | Music therapy (individual session of 30 min/week) |
3 |
|
40 weeks for two patients and 20 weeks for the third patient | The children showed some degree of mental and physical development: improvement of the purposive hand use, development of language comprehension, development of the ability to communicate by using cards or gestures, development in listening and playing instruments | 4 (C) |
| Bumin G. 2003 [38] |
Case report | Hydrotherapy (Halliwick method) | 1 | The tests included:
|
8 weeks |
|
4 (C) |
| Lotan M. 2004 [39] |
Case series | A daily training program on a treadmill | 4 |
|
2 months |
|
4 (C) |
| Elefant C. 2004 [40] |
Case report | Dual intervention: physical and music therapy | 1 | Narrative summary | N.S. |
|
4 (C) |
| Lotan M. 2005 [41] |
Case report | A management plan consisting of: opposing asymmetry postures, walking and/or standing, maintaining spinal mobility through passive manual manipulation, individualized aids, parental and staff guidance | 1 | Measurement of the Cobb angle by X-ray in supine and suspended position | 1 year and 6 months |
|
4 (C) |
| Lotan M. 2006 [42] |
Case report | Snoezelen (Controlled Multisensory Environment) | 3 (case 1 stage II; case 2 stage III; case 3 stage IV) |
Narrative summary |
|
Case 1: Agitation diminished and the patient was much more relaxed throughout the day Case 2: falls have completely ceased although posture did not seem to visually change Case 3: JROM increased throughout the body, enough to ease patient’s daily suffering and alleviate caregivers’ difficulties |
4 (C) |
| Lotan M. 2007 [43] |
Case report | Different alternative therapeutic interventions: Animal-Assisted Therapy (AAT), Auditory Integration Training (AIT), hyperbaric chamber, acupuncture/acupressure, aromatherapy, craniosacral therapy, Mayo fascial release, chiropractor, Reiki, Treager massage, cognitive rehabilitation, Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), Advanced Biomechanical Rehabilitation (ABR), Doman-Delacato approach, Yoga | 1 | Narrative summary | 3 years | The patient definitely made meaningful and significant progress for herself | 4 (C) |
| Pizzamiglio M.R. 2008 [44] |
Case report | Acclimating to the therapeutic setting + computerized visual-motor coordination training + sensory-motor rehabilitative program | 1 |
|
3 years |
|
4 (C) |
| Lotan M. 2009 [45] |
Case report | Hydrotherapy | 1 | Narrative summary | 3 years | The patient gained control over the body, thereby improving his functional abilities. Such gains, accompanied by improved communication skills, enhanced the child’s control over his daily situations, thereby achieving a feeling of self-worth and empowerment. | 4 (C) |
| Lotan M. 2012 [46] |
Single-case A-B design |
Conductive Environment (CE) | 3 |
|
2 years |
|
4 (C) |
| Lotan M. 2012 [47] |
Case report | The intervention program includes two sections:
|
1 | Functional Independence Measure (FIM) | 3 years | The FIM score switched from 18 to 25. | 4 (C) |
| Hackett S. 2013 [48] |
Case report | Music therapy | 1 | Retrospective video analysis | 6 months | Hand movements have become more purposeful. Motor skills (specifically holding) enhanced. Intentional communication improved through promoting turn-tasking. | 4 (C) |
| Stasolla F. 2013 [49] |
Multiple Baseline | Microswitch-based program | 2 |
|
About 6 months |
|
4 (C) |
| Lancioni G.E. 2014 [50] |
Single-case A-B-A-B | Microswitch-aided program (2 interventions) |
1 with RTT and 1 with congenital encephalopathy |
|
N.S. | Increase in microswitch responses and level of happiness for both participants during the intervention phases | 4 (C) |
| Lotan M. 2015 [51] |
Case report | Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA) | 1 | Number of steps taken daily (accelerometer) | 3 months | From 800 to 8000 steps/day | 4 (C) |
| Schaefer- Campion C. 2015 [52] |
Case report | A series of assistive device trials:
|
1 | Gait analysis including:
|
6 months | The anterior four-wheeled walker with a horizontal bar and lateral handholds was chosen | 4 (C) |
| Stasolla F. 2015 [53] |
Multiple baseline | Technological aids | 3 |
|
About 6 months (225 sessions) |
|
4 (C) |
| Mraz K.M. 2016 [54] |
Case series | Virtual Reality Intervention for Rett Syndrome (RTT-IVR) | 6 | Narrative summary + interviews | N.S. | Interviews and observation revealed successful game play when games were motivating, clearly established cause and effect, and matched level of cognitive ability of the participant | 4 (C) |
| McAmis N.H. 2017 [55] |
Case report | Virtual reality | 1 | System Usability Scale (SUS) | 8 months | The ultimate feasibility percentile was calculated to be in the seventieth percentile which ranks in the “good” category. | 4 (C) |
| Downs J. 2018 [56] |
Modified individually randomized stepped wedge | Environmental Enrichment (EE) | 12 |
|
6 months |
|
2b (B) |
| Larsson G. 2018 [57] |
Case-control study | To walk on a treadmill at the maximum comfortable walking speed | 12 RTT girls and 14 healthy females |
|
Six-minute single test | The changes in cardiac sensitivity to baroreflex and cardiac vagal tone in people with RTT compared to controls indicated more arousal, but only when the treadmill was started; as they continued walking, the arousal dropped to control level. People with RTT exhibited little changes in pCO2 whereas the controls showed increased values during walking. | 3 (C) |
(JROM)—joint range of motion, (RTT)—Rett syndrome, (BDNF)—blood brain derived neurotrophic factor.
3.1. Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)
ABA was analyzed in two of the selected papers. In their 2007 review about alternative interventions for people affected by RTT, Lotan and colleagues stated that the use of ABA was extremely positive with reference to the acquisition of skills and the enhancement of the patient involvement in daily situations [43].
The 2015 study by Lotan et al. described a case report where ABA techniques succeeded in extending the patient daily walking ability [51].
3.2. Conductive Education (CE)
The 2012 single-case A-B design study by Lotan et al. assessed the functional skills of three girls with RTT aged 3–5 years before and during participation in a CE program [46]. Results showed that gross motor function skills improved at the end of the intervention period, but slightly declined in the following months of inactivity.
3.3. Environmental Enrichment (EE)
The 2018 modified individually randomized stepped wedge trial by Downs and colleagues investigated the effects of EE on gross motor skills and Blood Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) levels in a group of 12 girls with RTT [56]. EE was able to reduce functional deficit and to boost brain function after 6 months of treatment. Growth, sleep quality and mood were unaffected.
3.4. Traditional Physical Therapy with or without Aids
Four of the selected papers belong to this group. In their 2001 case report, Larsson et al. stressed the importance of keeping the feet of RTT patients in good position making it possible to stand and walk. The combination of surgery, physiotherapy and well-fitting orthoses was used to manage feet malpositions [36]. The results showed that such combined approach allowed (1) to prevent muscle contracture and joint stiffness, (2) to regain ability to make transfers independently, and (3) to walk again even after a period of immobility.
The 2005 case report by Lotan et al. described a new management approach to scoliosis in a girl with RTT [41]. The patient underwent intensive therapeutic exercise, carried out with adapted equipment (cushion, seat, chair, and standing frame), and hydrotherapy. The results seemed to indicate that this intervention might be effective in treating scoliosis in RTT patients.
In their 2012 case report, Lotan and colleagues described a patient affected by RTT who regained her walking ability at the age of 28 years thanks to a three years of intensive activity programme, after being in a wheelchair for about five years [47]. The intervention programme included (1) a daily section implemented by the caregivers, consisting of lying position and walking exercises, and (2) a section performed by the physical therapist twice weekly, including joint mobility, balance training, walking exercises, and stair climbing and descending.
The 2015 case report by Schaefer-Campion et al. suggested that physical therapist and health professionals are essential in the process of selecting the assistive device for children with RTT to promote ambulation [52].
3.5. Hydrotherapy
In their 2003 case report, Bumin et al. investigated the effect of hydrotherapy, practiced in accordance to the Halliwick method for 8 weeks on an 11-year-old girl with RTT [38]. Immediately after hydrotherapy, stereotypical movements decreased, feeding activities and hand skills increased, walking balance was improved, interaction with environment intensified and hyperactive behavior and anxiety diminished.
In the 2009 study by Lotan et al., the importance of water as a mediating environment for managing people with RTT was explained [45]. The authors introduced a case study of effective intervention strategies for a young child. Hydrotherapy improved communication and motor skills, enhancing the patient’s control over daily situations.
3.6. Treadmill
The 2004 study by Lotan et al. showed that a daily training program on a treadmill lasting two months was capable of improving functional ability in four girls with RTT [39]. Furthermore, the authors stated that non-professional personnel could execute such a program under supervision of a qualified physical therapist. This was a non-controlled observational clinical trial.
The 2018 case-control study by Larsson et al. investigated the autonomic responses during walking on a treadmill in 12 females with RTT and in 14 healthy females [57]. The results showed that individuals with RTT could walk continuously for up to six minutes at their own maximum sustainable speed on a treadmill. The autonomic reactions in RTT patients differed only in the time course but not in amplitude compared with that in the control group.
3.7. Music Therapy
In the 2001 case report by Yasuhara et al., thirty-minute private sessions of active music therapy were used to treat three children with RTT. At the end of the treatment, patients showed (1) some degree of mental and physical development, (2) improvement of purposive hand use, and (3) development of language comprehension [37].
In their 2004 case report, Elefant and colleagues showed that a dual music and physical intervention approach allowed to shorten treatment time and to reach therapy possibilities that were unavailable with single therapeutic arrangement [40]. Patient’s communication choice-making abilities advanced dramatically, with positive effects on independence, self-esteem, self-confidence, and quality of life.
The 2013 case report by Hackett et al. showed that six months of music therapy provided opportunities for a four-year-old child with RRT to increase skills related to functional hand use and social interaction [48].
3.8. Computerized Systems
The 2008 case report by Pizzamiglio et al. stated that an experimental, computerized visual-motor coordination training in association with a sensory-motor rehabilitative program based on Piaget’s theory, lasting 3 years, provided a patient with RTT with a partial recovery of voluntary and purposeful use of the hands. Such a program promoted the development of action and interaction schemes with the external world and enhanced behaviors suitable to the environment stimulations [44].
The 2013 multiple baseline design study by Stasolla et al. showed that a microswitch-based program lasting 6 months increased performance and indices of happiness and decreased stereotyped behaviors for two girls with RTT and multiple disabilities [49].
In their 2014 study, Lancioni et al. stated that microswitch-aided programs for adults with RTT (1) increased level of responding and stimulation input, (2) represented a very advantageous opportunity thanks to the use of activation responses, that could be performed through different movements, and (3) increased indices of happiness [50].
The 2015 study by Stasolla et al. showed that the use of assistive technologies was able to increase the adaptive responses and to decrease the stereotyped behaviors in three girls with RTT [53]. Moreover, during intervention patients improved their mood with positive consequences on the quality of life. In conclusion, the authors stated that assistive technologies based programs could be useful to increase occupation opportunities in people with RTT.
In their 2016 case series, Mraz and colleagues analyzed the feasibility of using an internet-based virtual reality intervention (FAAST software and Microsoft Kinetect sensor) for six girls with RTT [54]. The results showed decrease of hand stereotypes and increase of hand and arm movements away from the midline during intervention. Interviews and observation revealed successful game play when games were motivating, clearly established cause and effect, and matched level of cognitive ability of the participant. Furthermore, the authors stated that internet-based virtual reality intervention should be highly individualized to increase motivation and success of intervention.
The 2017 study by McAmis et al. showed that the virtual reality system named VR_Color, specifically tailored for people with RTT, was able to decrease the characteristic repetitive hand movements and to increase the use of hands in skilled functions [55]. Moreover, this intervention proved to be successful in severe RTT cases, differently from the FAAST system, which has not been tested in the treatment of such patients [54].
3.9. Sensory-Based Treatment (Snoezelen)
The 2006 article by Lotan reviewed the available scientific materials on the topic of Snoezelen, also known as controlled multisensory environment, incorporating clinical knowledge in the field of RTT and suggesting this approach as an appropriate intervention method for this population [42]. Three case reports have been analyzed; Snoezelen was able to relax the patient, to reduce muscle tone, to improve articular range of motion, and to enhance gait and balance. No posture improvement was reported.
4. Discussion
RTT is a rare, neurodevelopmental disorder that primarily affects females resulting in severe cognitive and physical disabilities. Treatment of RTT is purely supportive as there are no specific therapies currently available. RTT is associated with a high prevalence of comorbidities, the management of which requires a multidisciplinary approach. With multidisciplinary health care, people with RTT can enjoy a better quality of life and a considerably longer lifespan. In order to achieve such positive results, the RTT multidisciplinary team should always refer to guidelines that provide a practical and ethical framework for decision-making. At present, the only available guidelines concerning physical therapy in RTT are the 2006 guidelines for individual intervention by Lotan, the 2009 guidelines for management of scoliosis by Downs et al., and the 2016 guidelines for management of bone health by Jefferson et al. [14,19,58]. One of the essential requirements of a trustworthy guideline is that it should be based on systematic reviews of the best available evidence, and should include assessment of the quality of evidence, whereas all the above-mentioned guidelines for physical therapy in people with RTT were based only on expert opinions. This led to the need for carrying out this systematic review of the literature.
This systematic review showed that available evidence for physiotherapy in RTT is low. The level of evidence of included studies ranged from 2b to 4 on the OCEBM scale. One study was a modified individually randomized stepped wedge trial with level of evidence 2b. One study was a case-control study with level of evidence 3b. The remaining studies were case reports and case series with level of evidence 4. Hence, in agreement with the OCEBM grades of recommendation, one of the selected studies was categorized as grade B and all the remaining studies as grade C (Table 1).
Regardless of the type of intervention practiced, all studies included in this review demonstrated that physical therapy improved the quality of life in patients diagnosed with RTT, mainly helping to preserve autonomy. On the other side, caution should be adopted in the interpretation of our findings since studies were highly heterogeneous in terms of participants, diagnostic criteria, interventions and outcomes. In particular, we would recommend the use of shared criteria in the diagnosis of RTT in order to make studies comparable [59].
A series of physical therapies are currently available to reduce or prevent limitations in people with RTT and to improve their quality of life. Such physiotherapies range from traditional approaches, like joint mobilization and hydrotherapy, to innovative methods, e.g. virtual reality and assistive technologies, and to almost alternative interventions, such as music therapy. Scientific literature showed that patients had clinically benefited from those different approaches despite the lack of strong research evidence. Several significant statements arose from this review: (1) early developmental intervention is imperative in order to assure that people with RTT reach their full potential, which is different for each patient; (2) physical therapy programs need to be individualized, both regarding types of intervention and program development, so that each patient may receive the most appropriate treatment for the stage of the disease and its personal needs, (3) currently no single reviewed physical therapy can be recommended over another for the lack of cross-comparative studies, but there is some level of evidence for each individual therapy with regards to its specifically measured outcomes, (4) multifaceted interventions lead to good results, and (5) a suitable intervention program must include appropriate involvement of the patient’s family or caregivers.
This is the first systematic review concerning physiotherapy in RTT. The present review was carried out following PRISMA reporting guidelines, with a clear, detailed and reproducible methodology.
This review has several limitations: (1) the small number of studies selected for the final phase, (2) the fair methodological quality of selected papers (e.g. small sample size, heterogeneity of interventions and assessment tools, short follow-up duration), (3) the impossibility of carrying out a meta-analysis, and (4) the lack of publication bias assessment. However, as stated in 2017 by Rath and colleagues, “clinical research in rare diseases needs to face several barriers that comprise the difficulty to recruit participants because of rarity, scattering of the patients, limited knowledge on natural history of diseases, difficulties to achieve accurate diagnosis and identify patients in health information systems, and difficulties choosing clinically relevant outcomes” [60].
Evidence-based physical therapy has been defined by Herbert as “physiotherapy informed by integration of relevant high-quality clinical research, patients’ preferences and physiotherapists’ practice knowledge” [61]. Nevertheless, in the event that high-quality clinical research is not available, like for RTT, Herbert stated that “good practice must make use of sources of any other lower quality research to inform action in practice” [61]. Therefore, we are confident that the findings of this systematic review will provide the best available practice management to clinicians and other health care professionals that work with RTT individuals every day.
5. Conclusions
A physical therapy program should be regularly recommended to patients with RTT, in order to preserve and restore movement and physical function threatened by the disease. This approach should be always individualized and adjusted to the needs of the patients. Preserving autonomy, improving quality of life, and supporting family caregivers should be the main objectives of such an approach.
Since the level of evidence for the scientific literature concerning the topic is currently low, future research should focus on carrying out studies with a better methodology and higher level of evidence. Given the difficulty in conducting traditional Randomized Controlled Trials (RTCs) on this topic, a valid alternative could be to perform Stepped Wedge Trials (SWTs), which involve a sequential roll-out of an intervention to participants over a number of time periods, such as in the 2018 study by Downs et al. [26].
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, M.F., F.S. and B.C.; methodology, M.F. and B.C.; investigation, M.F.; data curation, M.F. and B.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.F. and B.C.; writing—review and editing, F.S. and B.C.; visualization, M.F. and B.C.; supervision, F.S. and B.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Gold W.A., Krishnarajy R., Ellaway C., Christodoulou J. Rett Syndrome: A Genetic Update and Clinical Review Focusing on Comorbidities. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2018;9:167–176. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.7b00346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Percy A.K. Rett Syndrome: Seeing the Way Forward. In: Rubin I.L., Merrick J., Greydanus D.E., Patel D.R., editors. Health Care for People with Intellectual and Developmental. Disabilities Across the Lifespan. 3rd ed. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2016. pp. 765–777. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vidal S., Xiol C., Pascual-Alonso A., O’Callaghan M., Pineda M., Armstrong J. Genetic Landscape of Rett Syndrome Spectrum: Improvements and Challenges. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:3925. doi: 10.3390/ijms20163925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Feldman D., Banerjee A., Sur M. Developmental Dynamics of Rett Syndrome. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:6154080. doi: 10.1155/2016/6154080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liyanage V.R., Rastegar M. Rett syndrome and MeCP2. Neuromol. Med. 2014;16:231–264. doi: 10.1007/s12017-014-8295-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Shah R.R., Bird A.P. MeCP2 mutations: Progress towards understanding and treating Rett syndrome. Genome Med. 2017;9:17. doi: 10.1186/s13073-017-0411-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hanefeld F. The clinical pattern of the Rett syndrome. Brain Dev. 1985;7:320–325. doi: 10.1016/S0387-7604(85)80037-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Leven Y., Wiegand F., Wilken B. Sleep Quality in Children and Adults with Rett Syndrome. Neuropediatrics. 2020;6 doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bianco E., Rota D. Oral findings in Rett syndrome: An update and review of the literature. Dent. Med. Probl. 2018;55:441–445. doi: 10.17219/dmp/99203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Henriksen M.W., Breck H., Von Tetzchner S., Paus B., Skjeldal O.H., Brodtkorb E. Epilepsy in classic Rett syndrome: Course and characteristics in adult age. Epilepsy Res. 2018;145:134–139. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2018.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Tarquinio D.C., Hou W., Neul J.L., Berkmen G.K., Drummond J., Aronoff E., Harris J., Lane J.B., Kaufmann W.E., Motil K.J., et al. The course of awake breathing disturbances across the lifespan in Rett syndrome. Brain Dev. 2018;40:515–529. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2018.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.National Organization for Rare Disorders. [(accessed on 30 December 2019)]; Available online: https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/rett-syndrome/
- 13.Killian J.T., Lane J.B., Lee H.S., Skinner S.A., Kaufmann W.E., Glaze D.G., Neul J.L., Percy A.K. Scoliosis in Rett Syndrome: Progression, Comorbidities, and Predictors. Pediatr. Neurol. 2017;70:20–25. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2017.01.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jefferson A., Leonard H., Siafarikas A., Woodhead H., Fyfe S., Ward L.M., Munns C., Motil K., Tarquinio D., Shapiro J.R., et al. Clinical Guidelines for Management of Bone Health in Rett Syndrome Based on Expert Consensus and Available Evidence. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0146824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Townend G.S., Van De Berg R., De Breet L., Hiemstra M., Wagter L., Smeets E., Widdershoven J., Kingma H., Curfs L. Oculomotor Function in Individuals with Rett Syndrome. Pediatr. Neurol. 2018;88:48–58. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2018.08.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lotan M., Zysman L. The digestive system and nutritional considerations for individuals with Rett syndrome. Sci. World J. 2006;6:1737–1749. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2006.264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kirby R.S., Lane J.B., Childers J., Skinner S.A., Annese F., Barrish J.O., Glaze D.G., Macleod P., Percy A.K. Longevity in Rett syndrome: Analysis of the North American Database. J. Pediatr. 2010;156:135–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2009.07.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ellaway C., Christodoulou J. Rett syndrome: Clinical characteristics and recent genetic advances. Disabil. Rehabil. 2001;23:98–106. doi: 10.1080/09638280150504171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lotan M. Rett Syndrome. Guidelines for Individual Intervention. Sci. World J. 2006;6:1504–1516. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2006.252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cup E.H., Pieterse A.J., Ten Broek-Pastoor J.M., Munneke M., Van Engelen B.G., Hendricks H.T., Van Der Wilt G.J., Oostendorp R.A. Exercise therapy and other types of physical therapy for patients with neuromuscular diseases: A systematic review. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2007;88:1452–1464. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Johnson L.B., Florence J.M., Abresch R.T. Physical therapy evaluation and management in neuromuscular diseases. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2012;23:633–651. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2012.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Corrado B., Ciardi G. Facioscapulohumeral distrophy and physiotherapy: A literary review. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2015;27:2381–2385. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.2381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Corrado B., Ciardi G., Bargigli C. Rehabilitation Management of the Charcot-Marie-Tooth Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Medicine. 2016;95:e3278. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Corrado B., Ciardi G., Iammarrone C.S. Rehabilitation management of Pompe disease, from childhood trough adulthood: A systematic review of the literature. Neurol. Int. 2019;11:7983. doi: 10.4081/ni.2019.7983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ryan J.M., Cassidy E.E., Noorduyn S.G., O’Connell N.E. Exercise interventions for cerebral palsy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017;6:CD011660. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011660.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Quinn L., Busse M., Carrier J., Fritz N., Harden J., Hartel L., Kegelmeyer D., Kloos A., Rao A. Physical therapy and exercise interventions in Huntington’s disease: A mixed methods systematic review protocol. JBI Database Syst. Rev. Implement. Rep. 2017;15:1783–1799. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Corrado B., Sommella N., Ciardi G., Raiano E., Scala I., Strisciuglio P., Servodio Iammarrone C. Can early physical therapy positively affect the onset of independent walking in infants with Down syndrome? A retrospective cohort study. Minerva Pediatr. 2018 doi: 10.23736/S0026-4946.18.05041-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Corrado B., Ciardi G., Fortunato L., Servodio Iammarrone C. Burnout syndrome among Italian physiotherapists: A cross-sectional study. Eur. J. Physiother. 2019;21:240–245. doi: 10.1080/21679169.2018.1536765. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Silva I.S., Pedrosa R., Azevedo I.G., Forbes A.M., Fregonezi G.A., Dourado M.E., Jr., Lima S.R., Ferreira G.M. Respiratory muscle training in children and adults with neuromuscular disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019;9:CD011711. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011711.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Bartels B., Montes J., Van Der Pol W.L., De Groot J.F. Physical exercise training for type 3 spinal muscular atrophy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019;3:CD012120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012120.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vola E.A., Albano M., Di Luise C., Servodidio V., Sansone M., Russo S., Corrado B., Servodio Iammarrone C., Caprio M.G., Vallone G. Use of ultrasound shear wave to measure muscle stiffness in children with cerebral palsy. J. Ultrasound. 2018;21:241–247. doi: 10.1007/s40477-018-0313-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Corrado B., Di Luise C., Servodio Iammarrone C. Management of Muscle Spasticity in Children with Cerebral Palsy by Means of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Dev. Neurorehabil. 2019:1–7. doi: 10.1080/17518423.2019.1683908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Santos C.M.D.C., Pimenta C.A.D.M., Nobre M.R.C. The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Rev. Lat. Am. Enferm. 2007;15:508–511. doi: 10.1590/S0104-11692007000300023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Moher D., Shamseer L., Clarke M., Ghersi D., Liberati A., Petticrew M., Shekelle P., Stewart L.A., PRISMA-P Group Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 2015;4:1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group OCEBM Levels of Evidence. [(accessed on 30 December 2019)]; Available online: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653.
- 36.Larsson G., Engerström I.W. Gross motor ability in Rett syndrome-the power of expectation, motivation and planning. Brain Dev. 2001;23:S77–S81. doi: 10.1016/S0387-7604(01)00334-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Yasuhara A., Sugiyama Y. Music therapy for children with Rett syndrome. Brain Dev. 2001;23:S82–S84. doi: 10.1016/S0387-7604(01)00336-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bumin G., Uyanik M., Yilmaz I., Kayihan H., Topçu M. Hydrotherapy for Rett Syndrome. J. Rehabil. Med. 2003;35:44–45. doi: 10.1080/16501970306107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lotan M., Isakov E., Merrick J. Improving functional skills and physical fitness in children with Rett syndrome. J. Intellect. Disabil. 2004;48:730–735. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2003.00589.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Elefant C., Lotan M. Rett Syndrome: Dual Intervention—Music and Physical Therapy. Nord J. Music Ther. 2004;13:172–182. doi: 10.1080/08098130409478114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lotan M., Merrick J., Carmeli E. Managing Scoliosis in a Young Child with Rett Syndrome: A Case Study. Sci. World J. 2005;5:264–273. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2005.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lotan M. Management of Rett Syndrome in the Controlled Multisensory (snoezelen) Environment. A Review with Three Case Stories. Sci. World J. 2006;6:791–807. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2006.159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lotan M. Alternative Therapeutic Intervention for Individuals with Rett Syndrome. Sci. World J. 2007;7:698–714. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2007.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pizzamiglio M.R., Nasti M., Piccardi L., Zotti A., Vitturini C., Spitoni G., Nanni M.V., Guariglia C., Morelli D. Sensory-Motor Rehabilitation in Rett Syndrome: A Case Report. Focus Autism Other Dev. Disabl. 2008;23:49–62. doi: 10.1177/1088357607311446. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lotan M., Barmatz C. Hydrotherapy for a young child with Rett syndrome. Review of the literature and a case study. Int. J. Disabil. Hum. Dev. 2009;8:349–357. doi: 10.1515/IJDHD.2009.8.4.349. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Lotan M., Schenker R., Wine J., Downs J. The conductive environment enhances gross motor function of girls with Rett syndrome. A pilot study. Dev. Neurorehabil. 2012;15:19–25. doi: 10.3109/17518423.2011.629374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lotan M., Gootman A. Regaining walking ability in individuals with Rett syndrome: A case study. Int. J. Disabil. Hum. Dev. 2012;11:163–169. doi: 10.1515/ijdhd-2012-0020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Hackett S., Morison C., Pullen C. A retrospective practice based evaluation of music therapy: A Single-case study of a four-year-old girl with Rett syndrome- Rebecca’s story. Arts Psychother. 2013;40:473477. doi: 10.1016/j.aip.2013.09.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Stasolla F., Caffò A.O. Promoting adaptative behaviors by two girls with Rett syndrome through a microswitch-based program. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 2013;7:1256–1272. doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2013.07.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lancioni G.E., Singh N.N., O’Reilly M.F., Sigafoos J., Boccasini A., La Martire M.L., Buonocunto F., Biancardi E.M., Sacco V. Microswitch-aided Programs for a Woman with Rett Syndrome and a Boy with Extensive Neuro-motor and Intellectual Disabilities. J. Dev. Phys. Disabil. 2014;26:135–143. doi: 10.1007/s10882-013-9349-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lotan M., Shavit E., Merrick J. Enhancing Walking Ability in Individuals with Rett Syndrome Through the Use of Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA): Review and a Case Study. Open Rehabil. J. 2015;8:1–8. doi: 10.2174/1874943701508010001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Scheafer-Champion C., Johnson N.L. Fostering Ambulation for a Preschool Child with Rett Syndrome: A Case Report. Phys. Occup. Ther. Pediatr. 2015;35:354–364. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2014.899287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Stasolla F., Perilli V., Di Leone A., Damiani R., Albano V., Stella A., Damato C. Technological Aids to Support Choice Strategies by Three Girls with Rett Syndrome. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2015;36:36–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Mraz K.M., Amadio G., Diener P., Eisenberg G., Engsberg J.R. Improving Upper Extremity Motor Skills in Girls with Rett Syndrome Using Virtual Reality. Intellect. Disabil. Diagn. J. 2016;4:142–151. doi: 10.6000/2292-2598.2016.04.03.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.McAmis N.E., Foreman M.H., Himmelrich M.D., Diener P.S., Engsberg J.R. Development of a Method to Use a Color Tracker for Motor Therapy for Individuals with Rett Syndrome. SM J. Pediatr. 2017;2:1012 [Google Scholar]
- 56.Downs J., Rodger J., Li C., Tan X., Hu N., Wong K., De Klerk N., Leonard H. Environmental enrichment intervention for Rett syndrome: An individually randomised stepped wedge trial. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2018;13:3. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0752-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Larsson G., Julu P.O.O., Engerström I.W., Sandlund M., Lindström B. Walking on treadmill with Rett syndrome—Effects on the autonomic nervous system. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2018;83:99–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.08.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Downs J., Bergman A., Carter P., Anderson A., Palmer G.M., Roye D., Van Bosse H., Bebbington A., Larsson E.L., Smith B.G., et al. Guidelines for Management of Scoliosis in Rett Syndrome Patients Based on Expert Consesus and Clinical Evidence. Spine. 2009;34:E607–E617. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a95ca4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Neul J.L., Kaufmann W.E., Glaze D.G., Christodoulou J., Clarke A.J., Bahi-Buisson N., Leonard H., Bailey M.E.S., Schanen N.C., Zappella M., et al. Rett Syndrome: Revised Diagnostic Criteria and Nomenclature. Ann. Neurol. 2010;68:944–950. doi: 10.1002/ana.22124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Rath A., Salamon V., Peixoto S., Hivert V., Laville M., Segrestin B., Neugebauer E., Eikermann M., Bertele V., Garattini S., et al. A systematic literature review of evidence-based clinical practice for rare diseases: What are the perceived and real barriers for improving the evidence and how can they be overcome? Trials. 2017;18:556. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2287-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Herbert R., Jamtvedt G., Birger Hagen K., Mead J. Practical Evidence-Based Physiotherapy. 2nd ed. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; London, UK: 2011. [Google Scholar]

