Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 23;189(8):788–800. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa006

Table 4.

Adjusted Mean Difference in 15-year Change in Cognitive Performance Among Black Participants According to Visit 4 Ethanol Intake Status, Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities, United States, 1987–2013

Test and Drinking Status at Visit 4 No. Baseline Cognitive Score 15-Year Decline a Adjusted Mean Difference a,b , c
Mean (SD) Estimate 95% CI Estimate 95% CI % d P for Difference e
Global factor score z score 2,342 −0.73 (0.75) 0.697
Never drinking 817 −0.85 (0.71) −0.53 −0.91, −0.15 0 Referent 0
Low to moderate drinking 531 −0.55 (0.77) −0.52 −0.90, −0.14 0.01 −0.10, 0.13 −2
Heavy drinking 78 −0.62 (0.91) −0.40 −0.82, 0.03 0.13 −0.09, 0.35 −25
Former drinking 915 −0.75 (0.74) −0.52 −0.90, −0.14 0.01 −0.09, 0.11 −1
Delayed word recall z score 2,340 −0.37 (1.11) 0.814
Never drinking 816 −0.39 (1.12) −0.95 −1.72, −0.18 0 Referent 0
Low to moderate drinking 530 −0.31 (1.16) −0.86 −1.63, −0.09 0.09 −0.12, 0.31 −10
Heavy drinking 78 −0.38 (1.13) −0.79 −1.62, 0.04 0.16 −0.30, 0.62 −17
Former drinking 916 −0.38 (1.06) −0.89 −1.65, −0.12 0.06 −0.13, 0.26 −6
Word fluency z score 2,334 −0.39 (1.06) 0.609
Never drinking 814 −0.53 (1.02) −0.40 −0.83, 0.03 0 Referent 0
Low to moderate drinking 529 −0.16 (1.1) −0.34 −0.77, 0.10 0.06 −0.06, 0.18 −16
Heavy drinking 77 −0.28 (1.13) −0.27 −0.75, 0.22 0.13 −0.12, 0.38 −33
Former drinking 914 −0.41 (1.05) −0.38 −0.80, 0.05 0.02 −0.08, 0.13 −6
Digit symbol substitution z score 2,325 −0.97 (0.94) 0.614
Never drinking 812 −1.13 (0.91) −0.26 −0.69, 0.17 0 Referent 0
Low to moderate drinking 528 −0.74 (0.94) −0.32 −0.74, 0.11 −0.06 −0.17, 0.06 21
Heavy drinking 77 −0.75 (1.06) −0.27 −0.74, 0.20 −0.01 −0.23, 0.22 3
Former drinking 908 −0.98(0.92) −0.32 −0.74, 0.10 −0.06 −0.15, 0.03 22

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.

a Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for age, age squared, sex, race-center, educational attainment, diet quality score, physical activity, smoking status, body mass-index, diabetes, history of stroke and the apolipoprotein E Inline graphic4 allele.

b Estimates were averages from 25 rounds of multiple imputation combined using Rubin’s rule and the variance of a function of the within and between completed data set variances.

c Difference modeled as the follow-up neurocognitive exam (visit 5; 2011–2013) z score minus study baseline (visit 4; 1996–1998) z score. Negative values correspond to greater decline compared with the referent (never drinker).

d Percent, positive values represent % greater decline relative to the referent group.

e P value for t test of equality of mean difference in 15-year change in cognitive performance across visit 4 ethanol intake.