Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 23;189(8):788–800. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwaa006

Table 5.

Adjusted Mean Difference in 15-year Change in Cognitive Performance by Visit-4 Ethanol Intake Status for Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study White Participants, United States, 1987–2013

Test and Drinking Status at Visit 4 No. Baseline Cognitive Score 15-Year Decline a Adjusted Mean Difference a,b , c
Mean (SD) Estimate 95% CI Estimate 95% CI % d P for Difference e
Global factor score z score 8,709 0.12 (0.72) 0.072
Never drinking 1,450 −0.02 (0.70) −0.84 −1.07, −0.61 0 Referent 0
Low to moderate drinking 4,247 0.25 (0.69) −0.83 −1.06, −0.59 0.01 −0.04, 0.07 −1
Heavy drinking 629 0.23 (0.69) −0.90 −1.14, −0.65 −0.06 −0.15, 0.03 7
Former drinking 2,383 −0.05 (0.72) −0.80 −1.04, −0.57 0.04 −0.02, 0.10 −4
Delayed word recall z score 8,706 0.06 (1.00) 0.177
Never drinking 1,450 0.01 (1.01) −1.37 −1.91, −0.83 0 Referent 0
Low to moderate drinking 4,246 0.12 (0.98) −1.36 −1.89, −0.83 0.02 −0.09, 0.13 −1
Heavy drinking 627 0.15 (1.01) −1.53 −2.08, −0.98 −0.16 −0.34, 0.03 11
Former drinking 2,383 −0.02 (1.03) −1.38 −1.91, −0.84 0.00 −0.13, 0.12 0.4
Word fluency z score 8,702 0.14 (0.95) 0.323
Never drinking 1,450 −0.11 (0.90) −0.43 −0.74, −0.12 0 Referent 0
Low to moderate drinking 4,245 0.27 (0.95) −0.43 −0.73, −0.13 0.00 −0.07, 0.06 1
Heavy drinking 628 0.36 (0.96) −0.50 −0.80, −0.20 −0.07 −0.17, 0.02 17
Former drinking 2,379 −0.01 (0.95) −0.45 −0.75, −0.15 −0.03 −0.09, 0.04 6
Digit symbol substitution z score 8,691 0.17 (0.79) 0.026
Never drinking 1,447 0.03 (0.78) −0.77 −1.04, −0.50 0 Referent 0
Low to moderate drinking 4,242 0.30 (0.77) −0.81 −1.07, −0.55 −0.04 −0.10, 0.02 5
Heavy drinking 627 0.24 (0.75) −0.87 −1.15, −0.60 −0.10 −0.19, −0.02 13
Former drinking 2,375 −0.02 (0.80) −0.77 −1.04, −0.51 0.00 −0.06, 0.06 0

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.

a Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for age, age squared, sex, race-center, educational attainment, diet quality score, physical activity, smoking status, body mass-index, diabetes, history of stroke and the apolipoprotein E Inline graphic4 allele.

b Estimates were averages from 25 rounds of multiple imputation combined using Rubin’s rule and the variance of a function of the within and between completed data set variances.

c Difference modeled as the follow-up neurocognitive exam (visit 5; 2011–2013) z score minus study baseline (visit 4; 1996–1998) z score. Negative values correspond to greater decline compared with the referent (never drinker).

d Percent, positive values represent % greater decline relative to the referent group.

e P value for t test of equality of mean difference in 15-year change in cognitive performance across visit 4 ethanol intake.