Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 10;10(7):1030. doi: 10.3390/biom10071030

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Effects of AMP/SUL treatments (100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg, i.p.) for five days on the expression of NR2B and NR2A in the AcbCo and AcbSh. (A) Immunoblot of NR2B and β-tubulin in the AcbCo and AcbSh. (B) Quantitative analysis using one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls test indicated that there was a significant decrease in the NR2B expression in the ethanol-control group compared to the water-control group, while post-treatments with AMP/SUL (100 and 200 mg/kg) for five days normalized NR2B expression in the AcbCo. Quantitative analysis using one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls test indicated that there were no significant differences in the expression of NR2B among the water-control, ethanol-control, ethanol-AMP/SUL (100 mg/kg), and ethanol-AMP/SUL (200 mg/kg) in the AcbSh. (C) Immunoblot of NR2A and β-tubulin in the AcbCo and AcbSh. (D) Quantitative analysis using one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls test indicated that there were no significant differences in the expression of NR2A between water-control, ethanol-control, ethanol-AMP/SUL (100 mg/kg), and ethanol-AMP/SUL (200 mg/kg) in the AcbCo. Quantitative analysis using one-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls test indicated that there were also no significant differences in the expression of NR2A among water-control, ethanol-control, ethanol-AMP/SUL (100 mg/kg), and ethanol-AMP/SUL (200 mg/kg) rats in the AcbSh. The symbol of statistical significance between any group and water-control group is shown on the bar of the group. Water-control group data were represented as 100% (relative to water-control). The values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5/group), (** p < 0.01).