Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 29;12(7):1726. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071726

Table 2.

Associations of the clinicopathological characteristics with CHEK1 expression levels in the 126 OSCC patients in this study.

Patient Characteristics Number of Patients No. of Patients (%) p Value
CHEK1 Low Expression CHEK1 High Expression
Sex
Male 114 57 (50.0) 57 (50.0) 1.000
Female 12 6 (50.0) 6 (50.0)
Age a (year) 51.8 ± 11.3 52.8 ± 1.2 0.336
Tumor classification
T1–T2 63 33 (52.4) 30 (47.6) 0.593
T3–T4 63 30 (47.6) 33 (52.4)
Node classification
N = 0 64 38 (59.4) 26 (40.6) 0.032 b
N > 0 62 25 (40.3) 37 (59.7)
Overall TNM stage
I–II 38 23 (60.5) 15 (39.5) 0.120
III–IV 88 40 (45.5) 48 (54.5)
Extranodal extension
No 94 49 (52.1) 45 (47.9) 0.413
Yes 32 14 (43.8) 18 (56.2)
Perineural invasion
No 68 36 (52.9) 32 (47.1) 0.475
Yes 58 27 (46.6) 31 (53.4)
Differentiation c
Well + Mod 110 57 (51.8) 53 (48.2) 0.285
Poor 16 6 (37.5) 10 (62.5)
Tumor depth
mm 14.3 ± 9.5 13.5 ± 10.3 0.475

a Mean ± SD. b Statistically significant. c Well: well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; Mod: moderately differentiated squamous cell carcinoma; Poor: poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma.