Table 1. Comparison of the Synthesized MIL-100(Fe) N2 BET Isotherm Values with the Reported Ones.
| sample | synthesis process | BET surface area (m2 g–1) | pore volume (cm3 g–1) | reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL-100(Fe) | hydrothermal without HF | 1836 | 0.34 | (16) |
| MIL-100(Fe) | hydrothermal with HF | 1770 | 0.76 | (32) |
| MIL-100(Fe) | microven method | 1350 | 0.86 | (33) |
| MIL-100(Fe) | hydrothermal HF, HNO3 | 2350.20 | - | (34) |
| MIL-100(Fe)/CoFe2O4 | hydrothermal | 2109 | 0.9 | (17) |
| MIL-100 | room temperature | 2028 | 0.07 | (36) |
| MIL-100 | reflux | 1593 | 0.88 | (37) |
| MIL-100 | hydrothermal HF, HNO3 | 2546 | - | (38) |
| MIL-100 | green synthesis | 1940 | 0.56 | (39) |
| MIL-100 | large-scale hydrothermal | 1800 | 1.15 | (40) |
| MIL-100 | hydrothermal | 1976 | - | (41) |
| MIL-100 | hydrothermal HNO3, HF | 2042 | 0.90 | (42) |
| MIL-100 | hydrothermal NH4F | 1626 | - | (43) |
| MIL-100(Fe) | hydrothermal HF | 2007 | 0.77 | (44) |
| Au/MIL-100(Fe) | fabrication process | 230 | 0.12 | (45) |
| MIL-100(Fe) | hydrothermal | 1598 | - | (46) |
| MIL-100(Fe) | reflux HF, HNO3 | 1754 | 0.80 | (47) |
| MIL-100(Fe) | hydrothermal DMSO | 1215 | 0.61 | (48) |
| MIL-100(Fe) | hydrothermal, HF | 1917 | 1.00 | (49) |
| MIL-100(Fe) | hydrothermal without HF | 2551 | 1.407 | this work |