Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 13;9(7):2207. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072207

Table 4.

Agreement between diabetes classifications for the OGTT and the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) test in U.S. women and men analyzed separately and combined, 2009–2016.

OGTT Classification Fasting Plasma Glucose Classification
All Subjects FPG: Normal FPG: Prediabetes FPG: Diabetes
OGTT: Normal n = 3595 n = 2043 n = 40
n = 5678 row %: 64.8 row %: 34.7 row %: 0.5
OGTT: Prediabetes n = 381 n = 758 n = 82
n = 1221 row %: 30.9 row %: 63.4 row %: 5.8
OGTT: Diabetes n = 37 n = 248 n = 228
n = 513 row %: 8.9 row %: 46.8 row %: 44.3
Column: n = 7412 Column: n = 4013 Column: n = 3049 Column: n = 350
Women Only FPG: Normal FPG: Prediabetes FPG: Diabetes
OGTT: Normal n = 2130 n = 781 n = 11
n = 2922 row: 73.4% row: 26.3% row: 0.3%
OGTT: Prediabetes n = 232 n = 360 n = 33
n = 625 row: 36.8% row: 59.2% row: 4.0%
OGTT: Diabetes n = 30 n = 143 n = 89
n = 262 row: 13.5% row: 52.8% row: 33.7%
Column: n = 3809 Column: n = 2392 Column: n = 1284 Column: n = 133
Men Only FPG: Normal FPG: Prediabetes FPG: Diabetes
OGTT: Normal n = 1465 n = 1262 n = 29
n = 2756 row: 55.3% row: 43.8% row: 0.8%
OGTT: Prediabetes n = 149 n = 398 n = 49
n = 596 row: 24.3% row: 68.0% row: 7.7%
OGTT: Diabetes n = 7 n = 105 n = 139
n = 251 row: 3.0% row: 39.0% row: 57.9%
Column: n = 3603 Column: n = 1621 Column: n = 1765 Column: n = 217

Note: SE: standard error of the weighted Kappa. For the 2-h OGTT, “Normal” was defined as a plasma glucose level of <140 mg/dL (<7.8 mmol/L), “Prediabetes” was 140–199 mg/dL (7.8–11.0 mmol/L), and “Diabetes” was defined as a glucose level ≥ 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L). For the FPG (fasting plasma glucose) assessment, “Normal” was <100 mg/dL (<7.0 mmol/L), “Prediabetes” was 100–125 mg/dL (5.6–6.9 mmol/L), and a diagnosis of “Diabetes” was defined as a glucose level ≥ 126 mg/dL (≥7.0 mmol/L). Because NHANES sample weights were applied to each participant, the sample size of each category should be interpreted using row percentages, which have been adjusted based on individual sample weights, not “n”. Results using “n” do not reflect the effect of the NHANES sample weights.