Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;9(7):2137. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072137

Table 3.

Age, sex, HIV status, and education-adjusted effect of CCRT vs. no CCRT intervention on performance in respective Neurocognitive Test Batteries.

LS Means (SE) β (95% CI) Effect Size p-Value Adj.R2
CCRT No CCRT
WHO UCLA Learning Tests (# Correct)
Immediate Recall (trials 1–5) 9.94 (0.20) 9.60 (0.20) 0.33 (−0.29, 0.86) 0.25 0.243 0.46
Interference List Recall (trial 6) 5.44 (0.28) 5.72 (0.27) −0.28 (−1.02, 0.46) −0.16 0.407 0.25
Post Interference List Recall (trial 7) 10.1 (0.35) 9.1 (0.35) 1.00 (0.02, 1.98) 0.43 0.046 0.30
Delayed Recall (trial 8) 10.2 (0.36) 9.2 (0.35) 1.04 (0.06, 2.02) 0.47 0.038 0.41
Word Recognition (trial 9) 13.7 (0.32) 13.6 (0.32) 0.09 (−0.50, 0.99) 0.04 0.841 0.12
Digit Span Test (# correct)
Short term auditory memory/simple attention 4.5 (0.19) 4.8 (0.19) −0.36 (−0.88, 0.17) −0.29 0.186 0.34
Short-term verbal memory 4.4 (0.24) 4.01 (0.25) 0.45 (−0.21, 1.12) 0.29 0.116 0.18
Overall score 8.76 (0.35) 8.72 (0.34) 0.03 (−0.91, 0.97) 0.01 0.949 0.34
Color Trails (time, s) 99.5 (9.7) 112.9 (9.7) −13.4 (−39.8, 14.0) −0.21 0.327 0.05
Finger Tapping Test (time, s) 38.1 (0.85) 37.3 (0.87) 0.83 (−1.6, 3.2) 0.15 0.498 0.05
Grooved Peg Board (time, s)
Grooved Pegboard NDH 0.06 (0.11) −0.12 (0.12) 0.18 (−0.16, 0.51) 0.24 0.296 0.45
Grooved Pegboard DH 0.07 (0.10) −0.14 (0.11) 0.21 (−0.07, 0.50) 0.32 0.143 0.51
Verbal Fluency
Verbal Fluency (Tot. Correct) 13.4 (0.85) 12.2 (0.91) 1.25 (−0.09, 2.58) 0.38 0.068 0.21
Timed Gait (time, s) 11.4 (0.52) 12.1 (0.52) −0.65 (−2.1, 0.83) −0.20 0.401 0.15
Symbol Digit Modality (# correct) 24.5 (1.9) 26.3 2.0) −1.78 (−4.74, 1.19) −0.25 0.239 0.63
Frailty score 1.98 (0.35) 2.09 (0.38) −0.12 (−0.74, 0.50) −0.09 0.714 0.22
Quality of Life Score 72.1 (2.6) 74.7 (2.8) −2.64 (−6.7, 1.4) −0.28 0.206 0.50

Estimates shown are age, sex, education and baseline score adjusted for each outcome measure in separate linear regression models. Measures of association (effect size and p-value for test of mean differences by intervention group) are shown for overall sample (regardless of HIV-status). Statistically significant differences and differences with corresponding effect size >|0.30| are bolded. Given the small sample size, we interpret potential clinical relevance using a combination of statistical significance and differences in ES of |0.3| which corresponds to at least a moderate effect per literature on patient-reported outcomes. ES differences of ≤|0.2| are considered ‘small’. # = number.