Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 13;9(7):2215. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072215

Table 1.

Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of patients included in this study.

TAV BAV TAVdil BAVdil p-Value
n 33 62 35 82
Age (years) 47 ± 2 41 ± 2 63 ± 2 52 ± 2 3.9 × 1011 **, b,c,d
Sex (male/female) (25/8) (45/17) (22/13) (58/24) 0.670
Body weight (kg) 71.32 ± 2.4 71.00 ± 2.0 80.50 ± 11.5 76.52 ± 1.8 0.183
Severe aortic stenosis (mean gradient ≥ 40 mm Hg) 0 (0%) 3 (5%) 0 (0%) 19 (23%) 2.1 × 10−5 **
Aortic valve gradient (mean, mm Hg) 3.57 ± 1.0 12.04 ± 1.8 2.85 ± 0.8 24.75 ± 2.6 5.5 × 1012 **, b,d
Left ventricle diastolic diameter (mm) 50.22 ± 0.9 52.20 ± 0.8 53.48 ± 1.0 53.79 ± 1.0 0.100
Left ventricle systolic diameter (mm) 30.35 ± 1.2 32.56 ± 0.8 30.01 ± 0.9 33.36 ± 0.9 0.175
Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) 71.92 ± 1.9 70.72 ± 1.2 70.86 ± 1.8 69.18 ± 1.1 0.568
Aortic root diameter (mm) 33.06 ± 0.8 33.93 ± 0.8 41.94 ± 1.2 39.32 ± 0.6 2.4 × 1013 **, b,c
Ascending aorta diameter (mm) 30.81 ± 0.6 32.56 ± 0.4 44.88 ± 0.7 44.36 ± 0.6 5.5 × 1047 **, b,c

TAV tricuspid aortic valve; BAV bicuspid aortic valve patients; BAVdil patients with bicuspid aortic valve and aortic dilation * Significant values (Overall p < 0.01); a, p < 0.05 TAV vs. BAV; b, p < 0.05 BAV vs. BAVdil; c, p < 0.05 TAV vs. TAVdil; d, p < 0.05 BAVdil vs. TAVdil. ** p-value < 0.01.