Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 7;12(7):1820. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071820

Table 3.

Relationship of target miRNA on clinicopathological details.

Target miRNA Grade Lymph Node Status OR Status PR Status HER2 Status
2 3 +Ve −Ve +Ve −Ve +Ve −Ve +Ve −Ve
Let 7a p = 0.112 p = 0.443 p = 0.242 p = 0.545 p = 0.407
(n = 59, n = 50) (n = 70, n = 40) (n = 71, n = 39) (n = 59, n = 52) (n = 32, n = 79)
miR-21 p = 0.124 p = 0.752 p = 0.090 p = 0.164 p = 0.783
(n = 61, n = 49) (n = 71, n = 40) (n = 73, n = 39) (n = 59, n = 53) (n = 34, n = 78)
miR-145 p = 0.968 p = 0.075 p = 0.406 p = 0.063 p = 0.877
(n = 60, n = 48) (n = 71, n = 38) (n = 71, n = 39) (n = 58, n = 52) (n = 32, n = 78)
miR-155 p = 0.217 p = 0.621 p = 0.483 p = 0.986 p = 0.593
(n = 60, n = 50) (n = 71, n = 40) (n = 73, n = 39) (n = 59, n = 53) (n = 34, n = 78)
miR-195 p = 0.016 p = 0.252 p = 0.014 p = 0.580 p = 0.477
(n = 61, n = 49) (n = 71, n = 40) (n = 74, n = 38) (n = 59, n = 53) (n = 32, n = 80)