Skip to main content
. 2020 May 16;9(6):13. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.6.13

Table 2.

Summary Results of the Robust-Clustered Regression Analyses Examining Relationship Between the Feature Counting and Estimated Counting Error With the Gabor Patch Set-Size and Observer Group for Experiment 1

Model Coefficient Estimate t-statistic P value CI
Feature Counting Intercept 0.79 4.06 0.02 0.19, 1.39
Set-size 0.76 16.17 0.00 0.61, 0.90
Anisometropia group 0.22 0.59 0.57 −0.69, 1.14
Strabismus group 0.71 1.73 0.13 −0.27, 1.69
Set-size × Anisometropia group −0.14 −1.67 0.14 −0.34, 0.06
Set-size × Strabismus group −0.38 −5.85 0.00 −0.54, −0.23
Counting Error Intercept 0.788 4.0565 0.023966 0.19, 1.39
Set-size −0.2425 −5.1774 0.011732 −0.39, −0.10
Anisometropia group 0.2243 0.5938 0.57351 −0.69, 1.14
Strabismus group 0.7096 1.7344 0.129845 −0.27, 1.69
Set-size × Anisometropia group −0.1372 −1.6729 0.143323 −0.34, 0.06
Set-size × Strabismus group −0.383 −5.8488 0.000822 −0.54, −0.23