Table 2.
Summary Results of the Robust-Clustered Regression Analyses Examining Relationship Between the Feature Counting and Estimated Counting Error With the Gabor Patch Set-Size and Observer Group for Experiment 1
| Model | Coefficient | Estimate | t-statistic | P value | CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature Counting | Intercept | 0.79 | 4.06 | 0.02 | 0.19, 1.39 |
| Set-size | 0.76 | 16.17 | 0.00 | 0.61, 0.90 | |
| Anisometropia group | 0.22 | 0.59 | 0.57 | −0.69, 1.14 | |
| Strabismus group | 0.71 | 1.73 | 0.13 | −0.27, 1.69 | |
| Set-size × Anisometropia group | −0.14 | −1.67 | 0.14 | −0.34, 0.06 | |
| Set-size × Strabismus group | −0.38 | −5.85 | 0.00 | −0.54, −0.23 | |
| Counting Error | Intercept | 0.788 | 4.0565 | 0.023966 | 0.19, 1.39 |
| Set-size | −0.2425 | −5.1774 | 0.011732 | −0.39, −0.10 | |
| Anisometropia group | 0.2243 | 0.5938 | 0.57351 | −0.69, 1.14 | |
| Strabismus group | 0.7096 | 1.7344 | 0.129845 | −0.27, 1.69 | |
| Set-size × Anisometropia group | −0.1372 | −1.6729 | 0.143323 | −0.34, 0.06 | |
| Set-size × Strabismus group | −0.383 | −5.8488 | 0.000822 | −0.54, −0.23 |