Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 2;12(7):1758. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071758

Table 1.

Recent clinical trials on chemotherapy in patients with Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS).

Years Phase Chemotherapy Regimen N Patients Clinical Significance Ref.
2019 III IVA with or without maintenance chemotherapy (VC) 371 Non-metastatic RMS Five-year DFS:
77.6% with IVA/VC and 69.8% with IVA (p = 0.06)
[27]
Five-year OS:
86.5% with IVA/VC and 73.7% with IVA (p = 0.01)
2018 III IVA with or without Dox 484 Non-metastatic RMS Three-year EFS:
67.5% with IVA/Dox and
63.3% with IVA (p = 0.33)
[25]
2018 III VAC or VAC/VI (substitution for half of VAC course by VI) 448 Intermediate-risk RMS Four-year EFS:
63% with VAC and 59% with VAC/VI (p = 0.51)
[28]
Four-year OS:
73% with VAC and 72% with VAC/VI (p = 0.80)
less hematologic toxicities with VAC/VI
2012 II Trabectedin 50 Recurrent sarcoma: RMS (23), EWS (16), and other sarcomas (11) PR 2.5%, SD 7.5%, and PD 90% [30]

IVA: ifosfamide, vincristine, and dactinomycin; VC: vinorelbine and cyclophosphamide; VAC: vincristine, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide; VI: vincristine and irinotecan; RMS, rhabdomyosarcoma; EWS, Ewing sarcoma; DFS: disease-free survival; OS: overall survival; EFS: event-free survival; Dox: doxorubicin; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progressive disease.