Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 6.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Jan 6;13(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0402-8

Table 3.

Evaluation of heterogeneity of treatment effects on primary end points: adjusted for patient covariates

Behavior Effect Effect estimate 95% CI p value
Daily calcium intake at 52 weeksa Model 2 Daily calcium intake at baseline 0.554 (0.526, 0.581) < 0.001
Intervention vs. control − 28.707 (− 65.081, 7.667) 0.122
Daily calcium intake at baseline × intervention 0.029 (− 0.006, 0.064) 0.104
Model 3 OSE-diet at baseline 15.941 (10.477, 21.404) < 0.001
Intervention vs. control − 4.931 (− 67.875, 58.014) 0.878
OSE-diet at baseline × intervention 0.592 (− 6.587, 7.770) 0.872
Model 4 Prior DXA at baseline − 27.055 (− 48.834, − 5.276) 0.015
Intervention vs. control − 18.054 (− 39.947, 3.839) 0.106
Prior DXA at baseline × intervention 25.658 (− 0.266, 51.582) 0.052
Model 5 High fracture risk at baseline 2.939 (− 27.091, 32.969) 0.847
Moderate fracture risk at baseline 31.713 (10.821, 52.606) 0.003
Intervention vs. control − 14.155 (− 31.128, 2.817) 0.102
High fracture risk at baseline × intervention 39.927 (3.623, 76.231) 0.031
Moderate fracture risk at baseline × intervention 21.461 (− 5.326, 48.248) 0.116
Proportion with vitamin D supplementation at 52 weeksb Model 2 Vitamin D supplementation at baseline 22.356 (18.297, 27.315) < 0.001
Intervention vs. control 1.070 (0.890, 1.287) 0.464
Vitamin D supplementation at baseline × intervention 0.857 (0.655, 1.122) 0.259
Model 3 OSE-diet at baseline 1.040 (0.974, 1.112) 0.233
Intervention vs. control 0.988 (0.521, 1.873) 0.971
OSE-diet at baseline × intervention 1.002 (0.930, 1.080) 0.955
Model 4 Prior DXA at baseline 1.024 (0.841, 1.249) 0.811
Intervention vs. control 1.077 (0.869, 1.333) 0.499
Prior DXA at baseline × intervention 0.898 (0.697, 1.156) 0.403
Model 5 High fracture risk at baseline 1.008 (0.761, 1.334) 0.958
Moderate fracture risk at baseline 0.981 (0.784, 1.227) 0.867
Intervention vs. control 0.969 (0.801, 1.173) 0.744
High fracture risk at baseline × intervention 1.028 (0.700, 1.508) 0.889
Moderate fracture risk at baseline × intervention 1.100 (0.834, 1.452) 0.498
Weekly exercise sessions at 52 weeksa Model 2 Weekly exercise sessions at baseline 0.463 (0.429, 0.496) < 0.001
Intervention vs. control 0.006 (− 0.212, 0.224) 0.958
Weekly exercise sessions at baseline × intervention 0.025 (− 0.028, 0.077) 0.340
Model 3 OSE-exercise at baseline 0.214 (0.174, 0.253) < 0.001
Intervention vs. control 0.496 (0.056, 0.936) 0.027
OSE-Exercise at baseline × intervention − 0.052 (− 0.107, 0.002) 0.060
Model 4 Prior DXA at baseline 0.011 (− 0.182, 0.205) 0.908
Intervention vs. control 0.057 (− 0.149, 0.264) 0.584
Prior DXA at baseline × intervention 0.046 (− 0.193, 0.284) 0.707
Model 5 High fracture risk at baseline − 0.054 (− 0.326, 0.218) 0.697
Moderate fracture risk at baseline 0.016 (− 0.204, 0.236) 0.886
Intervention vs. control 0.067 (− 0.125, 0.259) 0.483
High fracture risk at baseline × intervention 0.101 (− 0.302, 0.503) 0.614
Moderate fracture risk at baseline × intervention 0.015 (− 0.247, 0.277) 0.911

Italics indicate statistical significance (p < 0.05). High fracture risk is > 20% 10-year fracture risk estimated from the baseline FRAX® score; moderate risk is 10–20% 10-year fracture risk

DXA dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, OP osteoporosis

a

For the daily calcium intake and weekly exercise session regressions, the effect estimates represent an adjusted linear effect

b

For the vitamin D supplementation regression, the effect estimate represents an adjusted odds ratio