Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Struct Equ Modeling. 2019 Jul 2;27(2):318–329. doi: 10.1080/10705511.2019.1620109

Table 1.

Parameter Recovery from the Correctly Specified 1-Factor Multilevel Structural Equation Model

Approach Variable Within Loading Between Loading Mean Residual Variance

Sim. E(X) SD(X) Sim. E(X) SD(X) Sim. E(X) SD(X) Sim. E(X) SD(X)
MSEM 1 0.80 0.80 0.004 0.70 0.70 0.04 2 2.00 0.07 0.1 0.10 < 0.01
2 0.70 0.70 0.003 0.80 0.80 0.04 3 3.00 0.08 0.1 0.10 < 0.01
3 0.85 0.85 0.004 0.75 0.75 0.04 1 1.00 0.08 0.1 0.10 < 0.01
4 0.75 0.75 0.003 0.65 0.65 0.03 2 2.00 0.07 0.1 0.10 < 0.01
5 0.88 0.88 0.004 0.88 0.88 0.04 4 4.00 0.09 0.1 0.10 < 0.01
6 0.82 0.82 0.004 0.72 0.72 0.04 2 2.00 0.07 0.1 0.10 < 0.01
7 0.84 0.84 0.004 0.71 0.71 0.04 5 5.00 0.07 0.1 0.10 < 0.01
8 0.67 0.67 0.003 0.68 0.68 0.03 3 3.00 0.07 0.1 0.10 < 0.01
ML-SEM 1 0.80 0.80 0.01 0.70 0.70 0.04 2 2.01 0.05 0.1 0.10 < 0.01
2 0.70 0.70 0.01 0.80 0.80 0.04 3 3.01 0.06 0.1 0.10 < 0.01
3 0.85 0.85 0.01 0.75 0.75 0.04 1 1.01 0.06 0.1 0.10 < 0.01
4 0.75 0.75 0.01 0.65 0.65 0.04 2 2.00 0.05 0.1 0.10 < 0.01
5 0.88 0.88 0.01 0.88 0.88 0.05 4 4.01 0.07 0.1 0.10 < 0.01
6 0.82 0.82 0.01 0.72 0.72 0.04 2 2.01 0.05 0.1 0.10 < 0.01
7 0.84 0.84 0.01 0.71 0.71 0.04 5 5.00 0.05 0.1 0.10 < 0.01
8 0.67 0.67 0.01 0.68 0.68 0.04 3 3.00 0.05 0.1 0.10 < 0.01

Note. Sim. refers to simulated values; E(X) indicates the expected parameter mean, SD (X) indicates the expected parameter standard deviation over 500 samples. MSEM indicates multilevel structural equation modeling (e.g., Goldstein & McDonald, 1988; Muthén, 1990, 1994); ML-SEM indicates multilevel structural equation modeling (Mehta & Neale, 2005). Because of suspiciously high outlier χ2 values, 4 samples from the MSEM approach and 1 sample from the ML-SEM approach were removed.