Table 1.
Approach | Variable | Within Loading | Between Loading | Mean | Residual Variance | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sim. | E(X) | SD(X) | Sim. | E(X) | SD(X) | Sim. | E(X) | SD(X) | Sim. | E(X) | SD(X) | ||
MSEM | 1 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.004 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.04 | 2 | 2.00 | 0.07 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 |
2 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.003 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.04 | 3 | 3.00 | 0.08 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 | |
3 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.004 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.04 | 1 | 1.00 | 0.08 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 | |
4 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.003 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.03 | 2 | 2.00 | 0.07 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 | |
5 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.004 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.04 | 4 | 4.00 | 0.09 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 | |
6 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.004 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.04 | 2 | 2.00 | 0.07 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 | |
7 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.004 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.04 | 5 | 5.00 | 0.07 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 | |
8 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.003 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.03 | 3 | 3.00 | 0.07 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 | |
ML-SEM | 1 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.01 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.04 | 2 | 2.01 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 |
2 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.01 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.04 | 3 | 3.01 | 0.06 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 | |
3 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.01 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.04 | 1 | 1.01 | 0.06 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 | |
4 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.01 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.04 | 2 | 2.00 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 | |
5 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.01 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.05 | 4 | 4.01 | 0.07 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 | |
6 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 0.01 | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.04 | 2 | 2.01 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 | |
7 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.01 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0.04 | 5 | 5.00 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 | |
8 | 0.67 | 0.67 | 0.01 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.04 | 3 | 3.00 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.10 | < 0.01 |
Note. Sim. refers to simulated values; E(X) indicates the expected parameter mean, SD (X) indicates the expected parameter standard deviation over 500 samples. MSEM indicates multilevel structural equation modeling (e.g., Goldstein & McDonald, 1988; Muthén, 1990, 1994); ML-SEM indicates multilevel structural equation modeling (Mehta & Neale, 2005). Because of suspiciously high outlier χ2 values, 4 samples from the MSEM approach and 1 sample from the ML-SEM approach were removed.