Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun;39(6):1177–1184. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5634

Table 2:

Descriptive statistics of the FA comparison between controls and patients with AIS in 2D segmentationa

Controls AIS P Value (Uncorrected) P Value (Corrected)b
Rostrum 0.7528 ± 0.02735 0.7455 ± 0.04039 .31 .62
Genu 0.6997 ± 0.02552 0.6870 ± 0.02955 .025 .08
Anterior midbody 0.6607 ± 0.04330 0.6647 ± 0.0366 .61 .73
Posterior midbody 0.6445 ± 0.05131 0.6516 ± 0.04586 .46 .68
Isthmus 0.7630 ± 0.03550 0.7631 ± 0.03340 .99 .99
Splenium 0.7845 ± 0.03228 0.7630 ± 0.03855 .004 .02
a

Data are means unless otherwise indicated.

b

P value after multiple comparison correction.