Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun;39(6):1177–1184. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5634

Table 3:

Descriptive statistics of the FA comparison between controls and patients with AIS in 3D segmentationa

Controls
AIS
P Value (Uncorrected)
P Value (Corrected)b
LH RH LH RH LH RH LH RH
Rostrum 0.7592 ± 0.02106 0.7664 ± 0.02260 0.7548 ± 0.02522 0.7645 ± 0.02396 .33 .69 1 .83
Genu 0.7349 ± 0.01735 0.7180 ± 0.0175 0.7246 ± 0.01843 0.7073 ± 0.02316 .005c .47 .03c .94
Anterior midbody 0.7144 ± 0.02782 0.6985 ± 0.02027 0.7150 ± 0.02142 0.7004 ± 0.02379 .91 .67 .91 .90
Posterior midbody 0.6921 ± 0.03998 0.6764 ± 0.03216 0.6973 ± 0.03141 0.6780 ± 0.03358 .48 .81 .82 .88
Isthmus 0.7655 ± 0.01978 0.7574 ± 0.02134 0.7612 ± 0.02547 0.7548 ± 0.02395 .36 .56 .87 .85
Splenium 0.7842 ± 0.02128 0.7883 ± 0.01990 0.7701 ± 0.02154 0.7841 ± 0.02404 .001c .34 .012c 1

Note:—LH indicates left-hand side; RH, right-hand side.

a

Data are means unless otherwise indicated.

b

P value after multiple comparison correction.

c

Statistically significant (P < .05).