Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 31;11:1144. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.01144

Table 1.

Language Assessment.

Subject P Reference value a
LNE1 LNE2 LNE3 LNE4 Mean SD
Primary Outcome Measures
Aphasia Quotient- Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WAB-R AQ) 78.4* 92.6 95.8 94.2 95.13 2.73
 Information Content 8* 10 10 10 10 0
 Fluency 8* 10 10 10 10 0
 Comprehension 8.5 9.7 9.9 10 9.01 0.78
 Repetition 8 9 9.2 9 9.31 0.91
 Naming 6.7* 7.6* 8.8 8.1 9.24 0.72
Secondary Outcome Measures
Snodgrass and Vanderwart Object Pictorial Set (SVOPS) 138* 167* 220 211* 232.86 10.48
Nombela 2.0 Semantic Battery (NSB)
 Picture Naming 23* 39 51 53 44.29 9.64
 Semantic Fluency 56* 79 102 79 136.71 35.4
 Word-Picture Matching 29* 32 35 34 36.67 2.73
Boston Naming Test (BNT)1 23* 31* 52 40 46.41b 4.4b
Peabody: Picture Vocabulary Test III (PPVT-III)2 2 42 63 39 Standard scores
Token Test (Shortened version) (TT-sv)3 <5 95 50 70 Standard scores
Psycholinguistic Assessments of Language
Processing in Aphasia (PALPA)
 Repetition: Nonwords (PALPA-8) 16* 22 24 23 23.42 0.79
 Repetition: Imageability x Frequency (PALPA-9) 147* 160 160 0.00
 Repetition: Sentences (PALPA-12) 26* 23* 28* 35.14 0.69
 Reading: Visual Lexical Decision (PALPA-25) 138* 142* 138* 151.43 3.03
 Reading: Grammatical Class (PALPA-32) 76* 75* 72* 80 0
 Reading: Nonwords (PALPA-36) 20* 19* 19* 23.86 0.38
 Reading: Sentences (PALPA-37) 33* 24* 32* 36 0
 Semantics: Spoken Word-Picture Matching (PALPA-47) 36* 37 39 38.14 0.69
 Semantics: Written Word-Picture Matching (PALPA-48) 35* 40* 38 38.28 0.76
 Semantics: Spoken Word-Written Word Match (PALPA-52) 33* 32* 34 36.80 1.64
 Semantics: Picture Naming (PALPA-53) 29* 34* 36 38 38.20 1.30
 Semantics: Picture Naming x Frequency (PALPA-54) 53* 55* 55* 58.85 1.07
 Spoken Sentence-Picture Matching (PALPA-55) 48* 52 53 53 56.28 2.69
 Written Sentence-Picture Matching (PALPA-56) 46* 48* 53 52 55.14 2.54
Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) 9 23 15 17 24.14 7.97

Asterisks (*) indicate significant differences at p < 0.05. Statistical comparisons were performed using one-tailed Crawford’s t-tests in all cases except for tests marked with. No statistical comparisons were needed for these tests since standardized scores provide a framework for comparing subject P’s performance against normative data. aReference values represent the mean scores and standard deviations (SD) of the control group, except for b, that represents the normative mean scores and SDs provided by the test, and , that refers to normative data. The numbers in each evaluation are the percentiles corresponding to the raw score obtained by subject P. Underlined scores are bellow two SD of the normative mean. Normative data were obtained from: 1Halperin et al. (1989), 2Dunn et al. (2006), and 3Olabarrieta-Landa et al. (2017).