Table 6.
Performance comparison of the proposed emotion recognition system in response to TEM with state-of-the-art methods.
| Method | Modality | Emotions | No. of | No. of | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TEM/Video Clips | Users (F/M) | ||||
| [91] | Eye gaze, Heart | Enjoyment, Perception | 6 (TEM) | 24 (9/15) | - |
| rate wrist band | |||||
| [35] | EEG | Happy, Angry, Sad, Relaxed | 2 (TEM) | 21 (10/11) | 63.41% |
| [36] | EEG | Happy, Angry, Sad, Relaxed | 2 (TEM) | 21 (10/11) | 76.19% |
| [85] | RSP and HRV | Happy, Angry, Sad, Fear, Surprise, Disgust | 6 (video) | 49 (19/30) | 94.02% |
| [98] | PPG, EMG, EDA | Happy, Sad, Disgust, Relaxed, Neutral | 40 (video) | 32 (16/16) | 89.53% |
| Proposed | EEG, GSR, PPG | Happy, Angry, Sad, Relaxed | 4 (Video) | 21 (10/11) | 70.01% |
| Proposed | EEG | Happy, Angry, Sad, Relaxed | 4 (TEM) | 21 (10/11) | 75.00% |
| Proposed | EEG, GSR, PPG | Happy, Angry, Sad, Relaxed | 4 (TEM) | 21 (10/11) | 79.76% |