Table 9.
Comparative results between the proposed work and the other related work.
| Methodology ↓ | Sensitivity | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|
| Crow Search Optimization based Intuitionistic Fuzzy Clustering [59] | 0.98 | 0.96 |
| Intuitionistic Fuzzy Rough Hybrid Technique [60] | 0.97 | 0.98 |
| Convolutional Network Method for Classifying Screening Mammograms [61] | 0.97 | 0.95 |
| Deep Neural Network with Support Value (DNNS) [62] | 0.97 | 0.97 |
| Proposed (IPFCM and Fuzzy SVM) | 0.99 | 0.98 |