Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 3;25(13):3047. doi: 10.3390/molecules25133047

Table 1.

Methods for the evaluation of matrix effects.

Name of the Method Description of the Method Limits References
Post-column infusion method The post-column infusion method provides a qualitative assessment of matrix effects. It permits the identification of the retention time zones in a chromatographic plot most likely to experience phenomena of ion enhancement or suppression. It consists in a constant flow through the LC-MS column of the mobile phase or blank, and the post column injection through a T-piece of the analyte standard. ME can be assessed as suppression or enhancement of the analyte signal in specific regions of the chromatogram.
  • Only qualitative results

  • Inefficiency for highly diluted samples.

  • The concentration of the analyte should be in the analytical range being investigated

  • Laborious and time-consuming procedure, especially for multiresidue analysis

  • Blank matrix not always available

[7,10,12,25,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]
Post-extraction spike method In the post-extraction spike method, the response of the analyte in a standard solution is compared to that of the analyte spiked into a blank matrix sample at the same concentration. Deviations from the responses of the two solutions are identified as ion enhancement or suppression. This method is able to provide a quantitative assessment of matrix effect.
  • Blank matrix not always available

[26,40,41,42,43,44]
Slope Ratio Analysis It allows a semi-quantitative screening of matrix effect. It exploits spiked samples and matrix-matched calibration standards at different calibration levels. This modified approach evaluates the same parameters obtained by post-extracion addition method in an entire selected range of concentrations instead of a single level.
  • Only semi-quantitative results

[28]
Relative MEs evaluation It permits the evaluation of the variability of MEs lot by lot
  • Laborious

[3,26,45,46,47,48,49]