Table 1.
Methods for the evaluation of matrix effects.
Name of the Method | Description of the Method | Limits | References |
---|---|---|---|
Post-column infusion method | The post-column infusion method provides a qualitative assessment of matrix effects. It permits the identification of the retention time zones in a chromatographic plot most likely to experience phenomena of ion enhancement or suppression. It consists in a constant flow through the LC-MS column of the mobile phase or blank, and the post column injection through a T-piece of the analyte standard. ME can be assessed as suppression or enhancement of the analyte signal in specific regions of the chromatogram. |
|
[7,10,12,25,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39] |
Post-extraction spike method | In the post-extraction spike method, the response of the analyte in a standard solution is compared to that of the analyte spiked into a blank matrix sample at the same concentration. Deviations from the responses of the two solutions are identified as ion enhancement or suppression. This method is able to provide a quantitative assessment of matrix effect. |
|
[26,40,41,42,43,44] |
Slope Ratio Analysis | It allows a semi-quantitative screening of matrix effect. It exploits spiked samples and matrix-matched calibration standards at different calibration levels. This modified approach evaluates the same parameters obtained by post-extracion addition method in an entire selected range of concentrations instead of a single level. |
|
[28] |
Relative MEs evaluation | It permits the evaluation of the variability of MEs lot by lot |
|
[3,26,45,46,47,48,49] |