Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 31;10:1149. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01149

Table 2.

Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models for overall survival.

Variable Univariate model Full multivariate model Reduced multivariate model
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Patients' risk Sex 0.565
Female Ref
Male 1.05 0.89 1.25 0.565
Age, year 0.002 0.003 0.003
<65 Ref Ref Ref
≥65 1.27 1.09 1.48 0.002 1.29 1.09 1.53 0.003 1.29 1.09 1.52 0.003
BMI <0.001 0.003 0.004
<18.5 Ref Ref Ref
18.5–24.9 0.60 0.49 0.75 <0.001 0.74 0.59 0.91 0.006 0.74 0.59 0.92 0.007
≥25.0 0.50 0.37 0.66 <0.001 0.60 0.45 0.81 0.001 0.61 0.45 0.82 0.001
Medical insurance type 0.046
Self-paid Ref
Rural insurance 0.71 0.56 0.91 0.006
Urban insurance 0.73 0.57 0.94 0.015
Others 0.95 0.35 2.60 0.923
Occupation 0.872
No Ref
Yes 1.03 0.74 1.43 0.872
Income 0.218
Very low Ref
Low 0.86 0.71 1.04 0.121
General 0.96 0.76 1.22 0.745
High 0.66 0.39 1.12 0.124
Social status 0.426
Very low Ref
Low 0.99 0.52 1.87 0.978
General 0.88 0.47 1.65 0.692
High 0.73 0.37 1.46 0.375
Very high 0.91 0.40 2.11 0.832
Residential address 0.745
Village Ref
City 0.98 0.84 1.14 0.745
Marital status 0.515
No Ref
Yes 0.80 0.42 1.55 0.515
Procreation status 0.209
No Ref
Yes 0.68 0.38 1.24 0.209
Smoking and drinking consumption 0.312
No Ref
Smoking 0.88 0.72 1.06 0.167
Drinking 1.26 0.83 1.90 0.273
Both 0.95 0.75 1.21 0.683
ASA score 0.043 0.002 0.002
I Ref Ref Ref
II 1.10 0.94 1.29 0.252 1.24 0.98 1.58 0.072 1.25 0.98 1.59 0.068
III–IV 1.51 1.08 2.11 0.016 2.09 1.39 3.15 <0.001 2.09 1.38 3.14 <0.001
Abdominal surgery history 0.675
No Ref
Yes 1.05 0.84 1.31 0.675
Intra-abdominal surgery history 0.615
No Ref
Yes 1.07 0.81 1.41 0.615
Comorbidity <0.001 0.043 0.040
No Ref Ref Ref
Yes 1.47 1.23 1.76 <0.001 1.32 1.01 1.72 0.043 0.76 0.58 0.99 0.040
Tumor's risk Tumor site <0.001 0.111 0.098
Lower Ref Ref Ref
Middle 1.27 1.03 1.57 0.023 1.18 0.96 1.47 0.122 1.18 0.95 1.46 0.126
Upper 1.12 0.92 1.36 0.280 1.06 0.86 1.30 0.589 1.06 0.86 1.29 0.591
Overlapping lesion of stomach 1.91 1.53 2.38 <0.001 1.32 1.04 1.68 0.024 1.33 1.05 1.69 0.020
pTNM stage <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
IIA Ref Ref Ref
IIB 1.24 0.86 1.80 0.248 1.21 0.83 1.76 0.320 1.23 0.84 1.78 0.288
IIIA 1.72 1.21 2.43 0.002 1.67 1.17 2.37 0.005 1.69 1.19 2.41 0.004
IIIB 3.08 2.27 4.19 <0.001 2.81 2.04 3.86 <0.001 2.91 2.13 3.99 <0.001
IIIC 5.41 4.02 7.28 <0.001 4.42 3.22 6.08 <0.001 4.64 3.39 6.34 <0.001
Tumor size, mm <0.001 0.013 0.012
<20 Ref Ref Ref
20–50 1.37 0.78 2.38 0.272 1.00 0.57 1.77 0.997 1.01 0.57 1.78 0.975
>50 2.60 1.50 4.53 0.001 1.29 0.73 2.28 0.385 1.30 0.73 2.29 0.370
Lymphatic vessel infiltration <0.001 0.231
Negative Ref Ref
Positive 1.32 1.14 1.54 <0.001 1.10 0.94 1.29 0.231
Pathological differentiation degree 0.001 0.172
Differentiated Ref Ref
Undifferentiated 0.72 0.60 0.87 0.001 0.87 0.71 1.06 0.172
Treatment risk Examined LNs, no. <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
>15 Ref Ref Ref
≤ 15 2.15 1.47 3.14 <0.001 2.82 1.90 4.19 <0.001 2.72 1.84 4.03 <0.001
Clavien–Dindo grade <0.001 0.037 0.033
None Ref Ref Ref
I–II 1.41 1.14 1.74 0.001 1.29 1.04 1.60 0.023 1.29 1.04 1.60 0.022
III–IV 1.64 1.21 2.23 0.002 1.27 0.93 1.75 0.139 1.28 0.93 1.77 0.124
Chemotherapy <0.001 0.003 0.004
AC group Ref Ref Ref
UAC group 1.48 1.27 1.73 <0.001 1.29 1.09 1.52 0.003 1.28 1.08 1.51 0.004

AC, Acceptable chemotherapy; UAC, unacceptable delay or missing chemotherapy; LN, lymph node; HR, hazard ratio.

Bold values indicates P < 0.05, statistically significant.