Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 31;11:1615. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01615

Table 1.

Studies for spontaneous tolerance in liver transplantation.

Institution Published year Living/Cadaver Pediatric/Adult Study design n Patient with S.E. Baseline biopsy Time since LT (criteria) yr IS regimen Success rate Acute rejection (Chronic rejection) Graft loss Remarks
Pittsburgh 1993 (54) Case series reports 6 Yes No NA NA NA NA NA First series report from Pittsburgh
1995 (55) 1997 (56) NA Mix Prospective 59 95 No Yes Mean 8.4 (>5) 14% Aza, 12% Tac 74% CsA 18/95 (19%) 25.4% (NR) 0 Two of PBC developed recurrence
King's College 1998 (57) Cadaver Adults Prospective 18 Yes No Median 7 (–) CsA and Aza 5/18 (27.7%) 28% (5.6%) 1/18 (5.6%) Fewer HLA mismatch was associated with successful withdrawal. Previous rejection history and autoimmune original disease are risk factor
Kyoto 2001 (58) Living Pediatric Partially prospective 26 (63) Partially yes No NA (>2) Tac 24/63 (38.1%) 12% (NR) 0 Biopsy at 4 year after weaning showed that 2 of 11 tolerant recipients had substantial bile duct atrophy and recovered by tacrolimus reinduction
2002 (59) Living Mix Prospective + retrospective 115 Partially yes No NA (>2) Tac 16/67 (23.9%) Non-protocol 25% Protocol 11.9% 0 None of clinical characteristics was identified as predictor of successful weaning
Marcia 2003 (60) Cadaver Adult Prospective 9 No Yes Median 5.1 (>2) CyA 3/9 (33%) 22% (NR) 0 Endothelial cell chimerism seems to have nothing to do with the induction of clinical tolerance in liver transplant patients
Stanford 2004 (61) NA Pediatric Retrospective 38 Yes No NA Steroid+CNI (Tac92%, CyA 8%) 8/38 (20.5%) 55.3% (5.3%) 2/38 (5.3%) Two patients were retransplanted for chronic rejection
New Orleans 2005 (62) Cadaver Adult Prospective 18 No No (>0.5) Tac 1/18 (5.6%) 61% (NR) 0 Early induction of operational tolerance seems to be difficult
Miami 2005 (63) Cadaver Adult RCT (donor BM) 105 No No Mean 4 (>3) 85% Tac 14% CsA 0% 67% (1.9%) 1/105 (0.95%) Donor bone marrow infusion did not help successful completion of withdrawal
Rome 2006 (64) 2008 (65) 2013 (66) Cadaver Adult Prospective 34 No Yes Mean 5.3 (>1) CsA monotherapy 8/34 (23.4%) 76.4% (NR) 0 All HCV related recipients
Israel 2007 (67) NA Adult RCT 26 No No Mean 4.3 vs. 5.0 (>2) CsA +/–Aza, (Plednisone) 2/26 (7.7%) UDCA+ 43% UDCA– 75% 0 3/4 AIH recipients had recurrence
Korea 2009 (68) Mix Pediatric Retrospective 5 Yes No Median 3.8 NA NR 0 Long term stable graft function and no rejection >1 yr were favorable findings for successful withdrawal
UCSF 2012 (69) Living Pediatric Multi-center prospective 20 No Yes Mean 7.7 (>3) CNI monotherapy 12/20 (60%) 36.8% (NR) 0 Later initiation of IS withdrawal after transplantation and less portal inflammation and total C4d score on screening biopsy were associated with successful withdrawal
Pamplona 2013 (70) Cadaver Adult Prospective 24 Yes Yes Median 9.3 (>3) NA 15/24(62.5%) 4.1% (41%) 0 Tolerant patients had a longer median interval between transplantation and inclusion in the study (156 vs. 71 months)
Barcelona 2013 (71) Cadaver Adult Multi-center prospective 102 No Yes Median 8.6 (>3) CNI mTOR inhibitor CSB 41/102 (40.2%) 56% (NR) 0 Time since transplantation, recipient age, and male gender were independent factor for successful withdrawal
2014 (72) Cadaver Adult Multi-center prospective 32 No Yes Median 7.2 (>3) CNI +/–MMF or CBS 17/34 (50%) 44.1% (NR) 0 Persistent viral infections exert immunoregulatory effects that could contribute to the restraining of alloimmune responses
Taipei 2015 (73) Mix Pediatric Single center retrospective 16 No Yes (>1 for Tx <1, > 2 for Tx > 1) Tac monotherapy 5/15 (33%) 46.7% (NR) 0 Early recruitment was favorable factor predicting operational tolerance
Chicago 2019 (74) Cadaver Adult Prospective 15 No Yes Mean 6.7 (>3) Silorimus 8/15 (53.3%) 40% (NR) 0 mTOR inhibitor withdrawal had similarly succeeded in comparison with CNI withdrawal
Pennsylvania 2019 (75) Cadaver Adult Multi-center RCT 77 No Yes Median 18 (>3) Tac (91) CsA (2), MMF(2) 10/77 (13%) 40.3% (NR) 0 Withdrawal showed likely less eventful than maintenance group

S.E., side effect; Aza, azathioprine; Tac, tacrolimus; CsA, cyclosporine A; NR, not reported; NA, not assessed; CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; RCT, randomized control study; CSB, costimulatory blockade; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil.