Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Aug 7.
Published in final edited form as: Aggress Behav. 2019 Aug 20;45(6):643–651. doi: 10.1002/ab.21858

Table 3.

Model effects

Model 1
Model path β Sig Males Females
Cooperative learning → Bullying (Slope) −.30 p < .001 - -

Model 2
Cooperative learning → Bullying (Slope) −.18 p = .002 - -
Cooperative learning → Cog Emp (Slope) .45 p = .001 - -
Cooperative learning → Aff Emp (Slope) .26 p = .045 - -
Cog Emp (Slope) → Bullying (Slope) .00 p = .988 - -
Aff Emp (Slope) → Bullying (Slope) −.39 p = .008 - -

Model 3
Cooperative learning → Bullying (Slope) −.14 p = .003 - -
Cooperative learning → Cog Emp (Slope) .33 p = .008 - -
Cooperative learning → Aff Emp (Slope) .20 p = .077 - -
Cog Emp (Slope) → Bullying (Slope) −.03 p = .733 - -
Aff Emp (Slope) → Bullying (Slope) −.31 p = .014 - -
Cooperative learning → Peer Related (T2) .18 p < .001 - -
Peer Related (T1) → Peer Related (T2) .43 p < .001 - -
Peer Related (T2) → Bullying (Slope) −.24 p = .005 - -
Peer Related (T2) → Cog Emp (Slope) .66 p < .001 - -
Peer Related (T2) →Aff Emp (Slope) .34 p < .001 - -