Table 3.
Model 1 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Model path | β | Sig | Males | Females |
Cooperative learning → Bullying (Slope) | −.30 | p < .001 | - | - |
Model 2 | ||||
Cooperative learning → Bullying (Slope) | −.18 | p = .002 | - | - |
Cooperative learning → Cog Emp (Slope) | .45 | p = .001 | - | - |
Cooperative learning → Aff Emp (Slope) | .26 | p = .045 | - | - |
Cog Emp (Slope) → Bullying (Slope) | .00 | p = .988 | - | - |
Aff Emp (Slope) → Bullying (Slope) | −.39 | p = .008 | - | - |
Model 3 | ||||
Cooperative learning → Bullying (Slope) | −.14 | p = .003 | - | - |
Cooperative learning → Cog Emp (Slope) | .33 | p = .008 | - | - |
Cooperative learning → Aff Emp (Slope) | .20 | p = .077 | - | - |
Cog Emp (Slope) → Bullying (Slope) | −.03 | p = .733 | - | - |
Aff Emp (Slope) → Bullying (Slope) | −.31 | p = .014 | - | - |
Cooperative learning → Peer Related (T2) | .18 | p < .001 | - | - |
Peer Related (T1) → Peer Related (T2) | .43 | p < .001 | - | - |
Peer Related (T2) → Bullying (Slope) | −.24 | p = .005 | - | - |
Peer Related (T2) → Cog Emp (Slope) | .66 | p < .001 | - | - |
Peer Related (T2) →Aff Emp (Slope) | .34 | p < .001 | - | - |