Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 5;9(7):10. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.7.10

Table 3.

Comparison Between PAROCTA and non-PAROCTA Vessel Density, Vessel Linear Density and Adjusted Flow Index in Full Thickness OCTA Slabs

Vessel Density (%) (Mean ± SD) Vessel Length Density (%) (Mean ± SD) AFI (Mean ± SD)
DR Severity non-PAR PAROCTA P Value non-PAR PAROCTA P Value non-PAR PAROCTA P Value
No DR 40.91 ± 3.77 42.78 ± 2.25 0.003* 21.56 ± 2.15 22.24 ± 2.01 0.010* 0.55 ± 0.02 0.54 ± 0.02 0.183
Mild NPDR 40.94 ± 3.23 40.80 ± 3.17 0.607 21.26 ± 1.93 21.08 ± 1.88 0.111 0.56 ± 0.02 0.55 ± 0.02 0.001*
Moderate NPDR 39.80 ± 3.61 40.44 ± 3.20 0.032* 20.51 ± 2.01 20.69 ± 1.88 0.190 0.56 ± 5.75 0.54 ± 0.02 <0.001*
Severe NPDR 40.16 ± 3.04 39.83 ± 3.39 0.413 20.48 ± 1.88 20.23 ± 1.97 0.141 0.57 ± 0.019 0.55 ± 0.03 <0.001*
PDR 37.45 ± 4.13 37.58 ± 3.82 0.694 18.96 ± 2.28 18.91 ± 2.11 0.728 0.56 ± 0.02 0.55 ± 0.02 0.007*

Non-PAR and PAROCTA measurements were compared using paired t-test. *Significance set at P < 0.05.