Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 8;21:526. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03533-6

Table 3.

Comparison of baseline and clinical data between PCl patients based on their type of PCL injurya

Variables Type of PCL lesion
Isolated Combined p-value
Sex - no. (%)
 Male 17 (100) 31 (81.6) 0.058
 Female 0 7 (18.4)
Age - yrs 25.6 ± 8.4 27.9 ± 8.6 0.366
Duration of injury to surgery - months
 Median and IQR 28.8 ± 50.6 27.4 ± 31.6 0.970
6 (3.75, 19) 19 (6, 39)
 Follow-up - months 37.7 ± 32.3 24.9 ± 10.9 0.032
Cause of trauma - no. (%)
 Traffic accident 10 (58.8) 29 (76.3) 0.381
 Sports related 6 (35.3) 7 (18.4)
 Miscellaneous 1 (5.9) 2 (5.3)
Chief complaint - no. (%)
 Instability 15 (88.2) 32 (84.2) 0.696
 Pain 2 (11.8) 6 (15.8)
Injury side - no. (%)
 Right 5 (29.4) 19 (50) 0.155
 Left 12 (70.6) 19 (50)
Type of operation - no. (%)
 Single tibial - single femoral tunnel 3 (17.6) 16 (42.1) 0.115
 Single tibial - double femoral tunnel 11 (64.7) 20 (52.6)
 Double tibial - double femoral tunnel 3 (17.6) 2 (5.3)
Meniscal injury - no. (%)
 Medial meniscus 3 (17.6) 2 (5.3) 0.467
 Lateral meniscus 1 (5.9) 4 (10.5)
 Both 1 (5.9) 1 (2.6)
 None 12 (70.6) 31 (81.6)
Chondral lesion - no. (%)
 Yes 6 (35.3) 11 (28.9) 0.638
 No 11 (64.7) 27 (71.1)
Type of graft - no. (%)
 Allograft 10 (58.8) 23 (60.5) 0.905
 Autograft 7 (41.2) 15 (39.5)
PDT
 Preoperative 2.8 ± 0.4 3.1 ± 0.6 0.042
 Postoperative 0.2 ± 0.4 0.3 ± 0.4 0.830
Cincinnati knee score
 Preoperative 42.0 ± 8.9 33.1 ± 11.4 0.006
 Postoperative 83.8 ± 10.5 77.5 ± 12.1 0.068
Full ROM - no. (%)
 Preoperative 8 (47.1) 8 (21.1) 0.50
 Postoperative 16 (94.1) 35 (92.1) 0.791
Complications - no. (%)
 No 16 (94.1) 32 (84.2) 0.587
 Arthrofibrosis and motion stiffness 0 3 (7.9)
 Deep vein thrombosis 0 1 (2.6)
 Infection 1 (5.9) 2 (5.3)

Abbreviations: PCL posterior cruciate ligament, PDT posterior drawer test, ROM range of motion, IQR interquartile range

aAll plus-minus values are means and standard deviations unless stated otherwise. Values have been rounded