Table 3.
Authors | IMA | Main finding | Method | Age in years, sample size |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ardizzi et al., 2014 | Mimicry (face) | More spontaneous mimicry of videos of facial expressions of peers | Behavior, EMG | 15−19, n = 20 |
*Bevilacqua et al., 2019 | Brain synchrony | No correlation between student-student and student-teacher synchrony and memory retention | EEG hyperscanning | 16−18, n = 12 |
*Brunsdon et al., 2020 | Action observation | Increases mu and beta suppression with age throughout adolescence | EEG | 10−86, n = 301 |
*Cook and Bird, 2011 | Automatic imitation | Congruency effect similar to adults; modulated by social priming in adults only. | Behavior | 13, n = 34 Adults n = 56 |
*Dikker et al., 2017 | Brain synchrony | Intersubject brain-to-brain synchrony in classroom modulated by closeness and shared attention. | EEG hyperscanning | 17−18, n = 12 |
Fitzpatrick et al., 2016 | Synchrony | Spontaneous phase entrainment with parent during pendulum swing | Behavior | 12−16, n = 9 |
Fourie et al., 2020 | Action observation | AON activity stronger with age and higher for communicative gestures in IFG and MTG | fMRI | 9.5–17, n = 16 |
Gordon et al., 2020 | Automatic imitation | Strong effect, modulated by block congruency rate | Behavior | 14−24 n = 50 |
*Oberman et al., 2013 | Action observation | Mu suppression during observation but not executions increases with age | EEG | 6−17, n = 51 |
Pokorny et al., 2015 | Action observation | Same network as in adults studies. Effect of object presence in IFG and SMF | fMRI | 9−17, n = 18 |
Xavier et al., 2018 | Synchrony | Improvement with age in instructed synchronization of movement and posture with virtual character | Behavior | 6−19, n = 38 |
* Wadsworth et al., 2017 | Imitation | Online Instructed imitation of hand postures; AON activity except in STS | fMRI | 8−17, n = 15 |