Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 8.
Published before final editing as: Prev Med. 2020 Feb 8;133:106022. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106022

Table 1.

Characteristics of study participants (N = 1,942).

Study group/intervention, n (%)
   Usual care (UC) 299 (15)
   Standard intervention (SI) 685 (35)
   Tailored intervention (TI) 278 (14)
   Tailored navigation intervention (TNI) 680 (35)
Sex, n (%)
   Male 575 (30)
   Female 1267 (65)
Age (years), n (%)
   50–59 1375 (71)
   60+ 567 (29)
Marital status, n (%)
   Not married 1061 (55)
   Married 881 (45)
Education, n (%)
   High school or less 1005 (52)
   Beyond high school 937 (48)
Screening attitudes (global score), n (%)
   Low (≤3) 195 (10)
   High (>3) 1747 (90)
Susceptibility,* n (%)
   Low (≤3) 1531 (79)
   High (>3) 391 (20)
Screening salience,* n (%)
   Low (≤3) 53 (3)
   High (>3) 1887 (97)
Screening response efficacy,* n (%)
   Low (≤3) 262 (13)
   High (>3) 1629 (84)
Screening worries,* n (%)
   Low (≤3) 1240 (64)
   High (>3) 676 (35)
Social influence/support*
   Low (≤3) 250 (13)
   High (>3) 1670 (86)
Decision stage
   Prefer not to screen 51 (3)
   Undecided about screening 290 (15)
   Prefer to screen 1601 (82)
Preferred test
   Stool blood test (SBT) 351 (18)
   Equal preference 975 (50)
   Colonoscopy (CX) 616 (32)
(*)

Counts for the attitudes subscales may not sum to 1,942 because of occasional missing data.