Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Mot Behav. 2020 Feb 10;53(1):72–82. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2020.1723483

Table 1.

M-mode loading factors

M1-mode M2-mode M3-mode
SOL 0.734 (0.099) −.150 (0.112) −0.022 (0.040)
GL 0.797 (0.052) −0.126 (0.107) 0.017 (0.033)
GM 0.821 (0.024) −0.174 (0.082) 0.030 (0.046)
BF 0.701 (0.080) 0.001 (0.122) 0.138 (0.062)
ST 0.644 (0.087) 0.076 (0.125) 0.062 (0.081)
TA −0.485 (0.079) 0.549 (0.093) 0.005 (0.059)
RF −0.418 (0.063) 0.710 (0.097) 0.024 (0.036)
VL −0.306 (0.063) 0.757 (0.095) 0.007 (0.041)
VM −0.234 (0.068) 0.749 (0.094) 0.008 (0.036)
TFL −0.118 (0.082) 0.385 (0.078) 0.164 (0.127)
ESL 0.667 (0.094) −0.142 (0.065) 0.234 (0.129)
EST 0.651 (0.093) −0.114 (0.062) 0.241 (0.128)
RA −0.007 (0.048) 0.165 (0.078) 0.513 (0.157)

Averaged loading factors across subjects are shown for the individual muscles. The values in parentheses represent standard errors. Significant loadings (>0.5) are shown in bold. Note the consistent patterns with dorsal muscles significantly loaded in the M1-mode and ventral muscles significantly loaded in the M2-mode. There was no significant loading for TFL because it was not consistently included in a specific mode across subjects. TA – tibialis anterior; SOL – soleus;l GL and GM – lateral and medial heads of gastrocnemius; BF – biceps femoris; SM – semitendinosus; RF – rectus femoris; VL and VM – lateral and medial vastii; TFL – tensor facsia latae; ESL and EST – lumbar and thoracic portions of erector spinae; and RA – rectus abdominis.