Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Behav Immun. 2020 May 12;88:220–229. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.033

Fig. 2: Recovery of body mass following LPS challenge is affected by circadian desynchronization.

Fig. 2:

After 5 days acclimatization to the behavioral phenotyping system, control and CD mice were weighed (baseline body mass) and then challenged with PBS or LPS (0.4 mg/kg). Baseline body mass did not differ between groups (n = 8 per group) (A). Survival analysis was used to evaluate if lighting condition impacted recovery of body mass to baseline following LPS challenge. While the recovery curves of PBS-treated control (n = 7) and CD (n = 8) mice were not statistically different, there was a statistically significant difference between LPS-treated control (n = 8) and CD (n = 7) mice (B). Dashed line indicates median recovery times. Statistical analyses used one-way ANOVA (A) and pairwise log-rank test with a BH correction for multiple comparisons (B).