Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 11;295(32):11056–11067. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.013751

Table 3.

Functional effects of mutating αM4–αM1/αM3 interfacial aromatics

Mutation Dose responsea
TMD α-helix EC50m) Hill slope n
WT 7.61 ± 1.25 1.70 ± 0.47 50
F225A αM1 0.71 ± 0.12b 1.57 ± 0.39 8
F227A αM1 6.51 ± 1.47 1.43 ± 0.16 8
F233A αM1 2.63 ± 0.31b 1.63 ± 0.20 9
Y234A αM1 No currentc No currentc 8
Y234L αM1 5.79 ± 0.72 2.20 ± 0.33 8
Y234F αM1 8.43 ± 2.03 1.66 ± 0.27 8
Y277A αM3 11.2 ± 1.97b 1.78 ± 0.58 8
F280A αM3 4.25 ± 1.00b 1.56 ± 0.29 8
F284A αM3 4.80 ± 0.75b 1.33 ± 0.21 9
F414A αM4 4.47 ± 0.82b 1.76 ± 0.34 10
F225A+F280A αM1+αM3 No currentc 8
F225A+F284A αM1+αM3 No currentc 8
F280A+F284A αM3+αM3 8.42 ± 2.98 1.45 ± 0.08 9
F225A+F280A+F284A αM1+αM3+αM3 No currentc 8
F233A+F414A αM1+αM4 1.08 ± 0.10b 2.21 ± 0.36 8

a Measurements were performed 1–4 days after cRNA injection (Vhold ranging from −20 to −80 mV). Error values are represented as standard deviations.

b p < 0.001 relative to the WT via one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's post hoc test.

c No significant current was observed up to 4 days after cRNA injection.