Skip to main content
. 2020 May 18;33(4):297–305. doi: 10.1177/1971400920924840

Table 1.

Clinical data and demographics of patients treated by flow diversion for ICABR aneurysms.

Age Sex Presentation No. of aneurysms/patient Site Size (max. diameter) Ruptured/non-Ruptured Angiography result at 6 months EVD inserted FD model Site of deployment No. of FD
1 36 Male Headache 1 Proximal A1 Re-canalised part 8 mm Non-ruptured Complete cure No Pipeline MCA to ICA 1
2 58 Male Family history of SAH 2 1 in proximal A1 and 1 in distal ICA Both are 2.5 mm Non-ruptured (Pending) No Pipeline ACA to ICA 1
3 43 Female Headache 1 Proximal A1 5 mm Non-ruptured Complete cure No Pipeline MCA to ICA 1
4 62 Male SAH, 10 days 1 Distal ICA 1.8 mm Ruptured Complete cure Yes Surpass MCA to ICA 1
5 27 Female SAH 1 Proximal A1 1 mm Ruptured Complete cure No Pipeline MCA to ICA 2
6 53 Female 10-year follow-up after previous SAH 1 Proximal A1 2 mm Non-ruptured Complete cure No Pipeline MCA to ICA 1
7 62 Female Headache 1 Distal ICA 20 mm Non-ruptured Complete cure No Pipeline MCA to ICA 1

EVD: external ventricular drain; FD: flow diverter; SAH: subarachnoid haemorrhage; ICA: internal carotid artery; ACA: anterior cerebral artery; MCA: middle cerebral artery.