Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 27;20(4):54. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11915

Table I.

Correlation between ECT2 positivity and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with gastric cancer (n=130).

Characteristics Total n=130 ECT2 strong positivity, n=35 ECT2 weak positivity/absent, n=95 P-value
Age, years 0.241
  <60 67 21 46
  ≥60 63 14 49
Sex 0.077
  Male 93 21 72
  Female 37 14 23
Tumor localization 0.091
  Cardias 20 7 13
  Body 40 15 25
  Antrum 52 8 44
  Whole/Multiple 18 5 13
Histology 0.216
  ADC, WD 19 5 14
  ADC, MD 42 7 35
  ADC, PD 48 19 29
  Signet ring cell 14 3 11
  Mucinous adenocarcinoma 6 1 5
  Neuroendocrine carcinoma 1 0 1
TNM stage <0.001
  I + II 67 8 59
  III + IV 63 27 36
pT (Tumor invasion) 0.039
  T1 + T2 22 2 20
  T3 + T4 108 33 75
pN (Lymph node metastasis) 0.896
  N0 42 11 31
  N1-N3 88 24 64
pM (Distant metastasis) 0.473
  M0 114 29 85
  M1 16 6 10

ECT2, epithelial cell transforming 2; ADC, adenocarcinoma; WD, well differentiated; MD, moderately differentiated; PD, poorly differentiated; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis.