Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 7;33(2):479–490. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00911-4

Table 2.

Samples that did not have a majority consensus on either fm-EEG or rm-EEG in Phase II

Sample Montage Rater 1 Rater 2 Rater 3 Rater 4 Rater 5 Rater 6a Majority
No consensus diagnosis on fm-EEG
1  fm-EEG SL/NL PD/ES SZ PD/ES SZ BSup NC
 rm-EEG BSup BSup SZ PD/ES SZ BSup BSup
2  fm-EEG SL/NL SZ PD/ES PD/ES SZ SL/NL NC
 rm-EEG SL/NL SL/NL PD/ES SL/NL SL/NL SL/NL SL/NL
3  fm-EEG SZ SL/NL PD/ES SL/NL SZ PD/ES NC
 rm-EEG SL/NL SL/NL PD/ES PD/ES SL/NL PD/ES SL/NL
No consensus diagnosis on rm-EEG
4  fm-EEG SZ SZ SL/NL PD/ES SZ SZ SZ
 rm-EEG PD/ES BSup SL/NL SL/NL SZ SZ NC

BSup burst suppression, fm-EEG full montage EEG, NC no consensus, PD/ES periodic discharges or epileptiform spikes, rm-EEG reduced montage EEG, SL/NL slow or normal activity, SZ seizure

aRater 6 served as a tie‐breaker when no majority diagnosis was reached between raters 1 through 5