Table A4.

Likelihood ratio tests examining whether there is significant variance in the effect of others’ presence in predicting episodic well-being.

	Outcome
Random slope for person present:	Episodic Positive Affect			Episodic Meaning			Episodic Negative Affect
	s2	Δ−2LL	p	s2	Δ−2LL	P	s2	Δ−2LL	p
No one	0.07	102.97	<.001	0.06	111.15	<.001	0.03	27.30	<.01
Partner*	0.06	62.06	<.001	0.05	80.51	<.001	0.07	51.56	<.01
Child(ren)*	0.08	54.39	<.001	0.09	88.33	<.001	0.07	44.71	<.01
Extended family	0.08	19.41	<.001	0.04	9.78	.002	0.20	50.51	<.01
Friend(s)	0.10	37.20	<.001	0.07	33.57	<.01	0.04	7.84	.005
Roommate(s)†		-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Client(s)	0.09	37.64	<.001	0.16	98.06	<.01	0.23	61.48	<.01
Coworker(s)	0.09	41.71	<.001	0.10	79.00	<.01	0.16	85.29	<.01
Boss(es)	0.10	18.76	<.001	0.09	28.53	<.01	0.17	28.26	<.01

Note: s² = variance in random effect; Δ−2LL = likelihood ratio test comparing models including and not including a random effect; p values are based on -Δ2LL being distributed roughly χ²(1).

Each predictor was tested in a separate model.

^*To separate the effects of simply having a partner (or children) from the effects of being with one’s partner (or children), these coefficients are the simple slope of partners (or children) being present for partnered individuals (or parents).

^†These models would not properly converge when a random slope was included.