Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 10;196:38–51. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.08.017

Table 1.

Comparison of COVID-19 and HIT.

COVID-19 HIT
Similarities
Risk of severe disease 1–5% (?) infected patients develop severe disease 1–5% heparin-exposed patients develop HIT
High frequency of thrombosis ~40–50% of ICU patients ~40–50% thrombosis rate
Higher frequency of thrombosis with greater disease severity Thrombosis rate higher in ICU versus ward patients Thrombosis rate higher in patients with more severe thrombocytopenia
Venous versus arterial thrombosis Venous predominance Venous predominance
Arterial thrombosis hierarchy Stroke > MI > limb Limb > stroke > MI
Occurrence of unusual thrombi Yes (e.g., CVST, mesenteric artery or vein) Yes (adrenal, CVST, mesenteric artery or vein, etc.)
Endothelial activation Yes Yes
Neutrophilia Yes Yes
Leukocyte activation Yes Yes



Differences
Prominent thrombocytopenia No (mild thrombocytopenia common); moderate to severe thrombocytopenia occurs in some patients with fatal COVID-19 Yes (>50% platelet fall in ~90% of patients with HIT; median platelet count nadir, 60–70 × 109/L)
In situ pulmonary thrombosis Common Uncommon
ARDS picture Common No
Pathological criterion indicating risk for thrombosis No distinct marker for risk for thrombosis Platelet-activating HIT antibodies detectable by platelet activation assay
Thromboprophylaxis and treatment consensus No consensus re: anticoagulant dosing Therapeutic-dose anticoagulation generally recommended (even in the absence of documented thrombosis)

Abbr.: ARDS, adult respiratory distress syndrome; COVID-19, coronavirus disease, 2019; CVST, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis; ICU, intensive care unit; HIT, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; MI, myocardial infarction.