Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 11;35(7):1171–1178. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfz134

Table 4.

Multinomial logistic regression models of AAC group with supplemental zinc, total zinc intake and serum zinc level

Variables Mild–moderate AAC versus no AAC
Severe AAC versus no AAC
OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
Supplemental zinc intake (per 1 mg/day; n = 1870)
 Unadjusted 1.01 (0.99–1.03) 0.20 1.03 (1.01–1.04) 0.002
 Model 1 1.00 (0.98–1.01) 0.86 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 0.95
 Model 2 1.00 (0.98–1.01) 0.91 1.00 (0.97–1.02) 0.74
Total zinc intake (per 1 mg/day; n = 1870)
 Unadjusted 1.01 (0.99–1.02) 0.36 1.02 (1.00–1.03) 0.01
 Model 1 1.00 (0.98–1.01) 0.53 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.42
 Model 2 1.00 (0.98–1.01) 0.55 0.99 (0.97–1.01) 0.42
Serum zinc level (per 1 μg/dL; n = 800)
 Unadjusted 1.01 (1.00–1.03) 0.07 1.00 (0.97–1.04) 0.76
 Model 1 1.02 (1.00–1.03) 0.06 1.01 (0.98–1.04) 0.50
 Model 2 1.01 (1.00–1.03) 0.11 1.01 (0.98–1.03) 0.71

Model 1: Adjusted for age, sex and race/ethnicity.

Model 2: Adjusted for variables in Model 1 plus caloric intake, diabetes, hypertension, smoking history, eGFR, albuminuria, albumin, serum phosphorus, proton pump inhibitor and diuretic use.