Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 10;10:13455. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-69025-8

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The performance comparison of only the best PC approach in each category (for aesthetics purposes) on all three “equal size” PSN sets and all 35 PSN sets of different size, with respect to raw AUPR values. Namely, results are shown for: the best of our proposed PCA graphlet-based network approaches (GRAFENE version NormOrderedGraphlet-3-4(K)), the best of the existing non-PCA graphlet-based network approaches (GR-Align), the best of the existing non-graphlet network approaches (Existing-all), the best of the existing non-network 3D structural approaches (DaliLite), and the sequence-based approach (AAComposition). The vertical dotted lines separate the PSN sets into the five PSN set groups, namely (from left to right): “equal size”, group 1, group 2, group 3, and group 4. For the equivalent results in terms of raw AUROC values, see Supplementary Fig. S21.