Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 24;24(16):8962–8976. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15530

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

FAM83H‐AS1 and FAM83H are significantly up‐regulated and are associated with clinicopathological characteristics. A, Relative expression of FAM83H‐AS1 in 67 pairs of ESCC tissues and corresponding normal tissues confirmed by qRT‐PCR method. B, Relative expression of FAM83H‐AS1 in four human oesophageal cancer cell lines detected by qRT‐PCR method. Pools: average expression in 10 normal tissues was used as normal control. * Compared with the pools. C, Relative expression of FAM83H‐AS1 in different subgroups. D, The subcellular localization of FAM83H‐AS1 in oesophageal cancer cells. E, Schematic representation of the genomic organization of FAM83H‐AS1 and FAM83H cited from NCBI. F, Relative expression of FAM83H in 67 pairs of ESCC tissues and corresponding normal tissues detected by qRT‐PCR method. G, The correlation between FAM83H‐AS1 and FAM83H expression determined by qRT‐PCR method. H, Relative expression of FAM83H in four human oesophageal cancer cell lines detected by qRT‐PCR method. Pools: average expression in 10 normal tissues was used as normal control. * Compared with the pools. I, Relative expression of FAM83H in different subgroups. Data are shown as mean ± SD; *P < .05 and **P < .01